شماره ركورد :
1236722
عنوان مقاله :
ارزيابي و اولويت بندي ريسك در بين دو گروه گردشگران انفرادي و گروهي در مقصد كوير مرنجاب
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Risk assessment and prioritisation between individual and group tourists at the desert destination (case study: Marnjab Desert)
پديد آورندگان :
قاسمي، ايرج جهاد دانشگاهي، تهران، ايران , ابراهيمي سليمي، شيدا دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ، تهران، ايران
تعداد صفحه :
18
از صفحه :
205
از صفحه (ادامه) :
0
تا صفحه :
222
تا صفحه(ادامه) :
0
كليدواژه :
مخاطرات , برنامه ريزي گردشگري , اكوتوريسم , كوير مرنجاب , FMEA
چكيده فارسي :
توسعه گردشگري علاوه بر توجه به زيرساخت‌هاي اين صنعت، نيازمند برنامه ريزي جامع و كامل عوامل ترغيب كننده و همچنين كاهش ريسك‌هاي محيطي و طبيعي درك شده از جانب گردشگران است. در ميان مقاصد گردشگري مقاصد اكوتوريسم از اقبال قابل توجهي برخوردار است، كه اين امر موجب بروز مخاطرات و همچنين درك مخاطبان از احتمال وقوع خطر در اين مناطق مي‌گردد. كوير مرنجاب يكي از مقاصد پربازديد اكوتوريسم كويري است. از اين رو مشكلات و مخاطرات بسياري تهديدكننده گردشگران مي‌باشد. در اين پژوهش سعي شده با روش توصيفي- تحليلي و با تكيه بر مطالعات كتابخانه اي و ميداني عمده‌ترين مخاطرات طبيعي و محيطي كوير مرنجاب شناسايي و تجزيه و تحليل شود. بدين منظور پس از شناسايي ريسك ها از طريق مصاحبه با خبرگان، پرسشنامه اي براي اولويت بندي جمع آوري گرديد و سپس از طريق تكنيك FMEA ارزيابي و تحليل صورت گرفت. طبق بررسي‌هاي انجام شده ازميان معيارهاي مخاطرات طبيعي و محيطي كوير به ترتيب باتلاق‌هاي كويري، زلزله و سيل بيشترين ريسك‌هاي تهديدكننده گردشگران در مقاصد اكوتوريسم كويري هستند.بر اساس سطح بندي ريسك هاي بحراني در ميان دو گروه گردشگران ريسك هاي درك شده تفاوت بيشتري نسبت به ريسك هاي سطح دوم و معمولي دارند. مقاله پيشنهاد مي‌دهد براي دو گروه برنامه متفاوتي تدوين شده و اقدامات لازم براي كاهش پيامدهاي ريسك هاي درك شده توسط دو گروه انجام شود.
چكيده لاتين :
The development of the tourism industry, in addition to paying attention to the infrastructure of this industry, requires comprehensive planning of persuasive factors, as well as reducing the environmental and natural risks of tourism destinations. According to research, tourists are affected by four types of risks, including health, cultural, political and economic, but among the natural hazards that endanger the health of tourists is of particular importance. Among the tourist destinations, ecotourism has a significant success, which causes many hazards in these areas. Maranjab desert for the relative temperament of temperature, tourist attractions, diversity of animal species and vegetation, and the existence of typical and prominent forms of desert is one of the most visited areas of desert ecotourism. Therefore, many problems and dangers are threatening. In this research, an attempt has been made to identify and analyze the main natural and environmental hazards of the Maranjab desert with a descriptive-analytical method based on library and field studies. methodology The general approach of mixed-method with the priority of quantitative method is based on qualitative studies. For this purpose, after identifying the risks, a questionnaire for prioritization was collected through interviews with experts and then evaluated and analyzed through the FMEA technique. The method of FMEA is one of the tools for continuous improvement of product and service quality. The purpose of the FMEA is to identify the risks and risks of the product and process that may be latent or obvious. Once identified, the next step is to make decisions that can be addressed. This method is used in medicine, manufacturing and services industries. In recent years, the use of this model for risk assessment in the humanities and tourism has also become popular. This method is based on three key components of probability of occurrence, severity of occurrence and probability of discovery. After returning the questionnaires and evaluating the quality of response, a random sample of 100 questionnaires was selected and analyzed based on the method of analysis of failure factors and its effects. According to the purpose of the study, half of the audience had an individual trip and half of them traveled to the area with the group. Audiences were asked to assign a score between 1 and 10 for each component of the method. Accordingly, each factor will have a score in each case, which is obtained from the average score of the audience and has been between 1 and 10. After identifying and evaluating the risk perceived by the audience, in an interview with professors and
سال انتشار :
1399
عنوان نشريه :
تحليل فضايي مخاطرات محيطي
فايل PDF :
8455871
لينک به اين مدرک :
بازگشت