بررسي تقابل تبري و تقيّه با تكيه بر آيات و روايات

that, as for the meaning of the term “Adiyat” the commentators have ted four probabilities: Hajjis’ camels, horses in general, army horse, and horses in a special jihad. The fourth theory is consistent with both atmosphere and context, and rhetorical and s

تبري و تقيه دو آموزه مقبول اماميه مي‌باشند كه از حوزه اعتقادي، آغاز و به بُعد رفتاري، ختم مي‌شوند؛ اين دو آموزه، داراي دو نتيجۀ متفاوت‌اند: تقيه، مؤمنان را به رفتار محافظه‌كارانه و حفظ شرايط موجود فرا مي‌خواند، اما تبري، صراحت در ابراز عقايد و بيان حقايق را به شيعيان پيشنهاد مي‌دهد. اين­دو، شيعيان امامي را به دو جهت مخالف سوق مي‌دهند. بررسي آيات و روايات مربوط به تبري و تقيه، در نگاه نخست نشان از تقابل آنها دارد؛ ولي با دقت در دلالت اين منقولات و توجه به اقسام تقيّه و تبري، درمي‌يابيم كه نه‌تنها تقابل واقعي ميان آنها وجود ندارد، بلكه به شرط رعايت اهم و مهم در به­كارگيري، در مسير تحقق هدف شارع مقدس - حفظ، تقويت و ترويج دين حق و هدايت مستضعفان- هماهنگي دارند.

(AS) and their victory in the Ghazw of “Zatol-Salasel”. Since before the surrendering of the Sura, something important was threatening the Prophet (PBUH), and three of the Sahabah did not succeed in delivering the necessary results in defeating the enemies, this is considered to be a Meccan sura so keep some certain truth hidden. The narratives behind surrendering of this Sura in Sunni sources have been questioned due to the many anxieties and conflicts and lack of harmony with the words and atmosphere of the surah, and the shortcomings of their historical sources have been explained in the description of the “Ghazw of Zatol- Salasel.” By deleting the parts related to the command of Imam Ali (as), they associate it with ‘Amr ibn al-’As who plays a smart part in what happens in this war. Keywords: Quran, Surah Al-Adiyat, Meccan Verses, Medinan Verses, Ghazw of Zatol-Salasel, Imam Ali (AS), the Shiite and the Sunni. Investigating the Confrontation between Tabarra and Taqiya Based on Verses and Narrations Rasoul Razavi1 / Ali Panahi 2 Abstract Tabarra and Taqiyah are the two accepted teachings of the Imamiyya, which begin from the domains of belief and ends in the behavioral aspect; these two teachings have two different results, and lead the Shiites of Imami into opposite direction. In this regard, the purpose of this study is to investigate the confrontation between the Tabarra and the Taqiyah and its results based on verses and narrations. The results indicate that although Tabarra and Taqiyah have two different perspectives, they do not confront each other, but complement each other’s activities in preserving, promoting and promoting religion. Tabarra and Taqiyah are two doctrines that are in harmony with each other and for the attainment of a single goal at the lowest cost, but the way believers behave depends on social conditions in any time. The believers have to properly evaluate the conditions and subsequently, selection of a proper behavior in accordance with existing conditions. This positioning can prevent the surrendering of wisdom and insistence on a clear Tabarra in all circumstances, as well as the fear and expression of untimely weakness, as Taqiyah, and unites the believers of every age to take advantage of the most effective method of religion.