پديد آورندگان :
شكاري، محبوبه دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد بوشهر، بوشهر، ايران , شرف زاده، محمدحسين دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد مرودشت، مرودشت، ايران - گروه زبان شناسي , ميرحسيني، حميد دانشگاه علوم پزشكي شهيد صدوقي يزد، يزد، ايران - مركز تحقيقات اعتياد و علوم رفتاري , يزداني، سعيد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد بوشهر، بوشهر، ايران - گروه زبان هاي خارجي , عامري، حيات دانشگاه تربيت مدرس، تهران، ايران - گروه زبان شناسي
كليدواژه :
آسيب درك نحوي , جملات تك فعلي و دو فعلي , فعل هاي دو ظرفيتي و سه ظرفيتي , زبان پريشي بروكا
چكيده فارسي :
زمينه و هدف: آسيب درك نحوي در بيماران زبان پريش مي تواند ضمن تضعيف عملكرد زباني، مهارت هاي شناختي را نيز تحتت أثير قرار دهد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف يافتن تفاوت در درك نحوي جملات تكفعلي دو و سه ظرفيتي با جملات دو فعلي در بيماران زبان پريش بروكا انجام شد. روش بررسي: پژوهش حاضر از نوع توصيفي-مقطعي بود. 45 بيمار زبان پريش بروكا با روش نمونه گيري در دسترس از بين مراجعان به كلينيك نوروتراپي مركز مشاورهٔ دانشگاه تهران در بهار 1398 به تشخيص متخصص مغز و اعصاب و تأييد آزمون زبان پريشي زبان فارسي نيلي پور(1390) انتخاب شدند. شرط ورود آزمودني ها به اين پژوهش تنها ابتلا به زبان پريشي بروكا و دستورپريشي ناشي از ضايعهٔ مغزي در نيمكرهٔ چپ مغز با تشخيص متخصص مغز و اعصاب و نيز تأييد برپايهٔ آزمون زبان پريشي بود. بيماران تحت درمان دارويي در اين پژوهش قرار نداشتند. داده ها با پرسشنامهٔ دموگرافيك محقق ساخته شامل بررسي متغيرهاي سن، تحصيلات، زبان مادري و دست برتري آزمودني ها و نيز آزمون سيستم كاركرد اجرايي دليس-كاپلان ( دليس و همكاران، 2012) براي بررسي درك جملات داراي فعل هاي دو يا سه ظرفيتي و جملات دو فعلي جمع آوري شد. داده ها با آزمون تي همبسته در سطح معناداري 0٫01 تحليل شد. نتيجه گيري: بيماران زبان پريش بروكا جملات تك فعلي را بهتر از جملات دو فعلي درك مي كنند و دچار آسيب بيشتري در درك جملاتي با افعال سه ظرفيتي و جملات دوفعلي درمقايسه با جملات تك فعلي دو ظرفيتي مي شوند؛ بنابراين بيماران زبان پريش بروكا دچار آسيب هاي متفاوتي در درك جملات تك فعلي و دو فعلي هستند.
چكيده لاتين :
Background & Objectives: The syntactic comprehension damage in patients with aphasia can debilitate lingual performance and simultaneously influence cognitive skills. Patients with aphasia, particularly those with Broca's aphasia are more vulnerable and act with further disabilities in
producing and perceiving verbs in contrast to the other grammatical topics. Aphasia is a disorder or disruption in the natural order and course of speaking with its effect being manifested in the comprehension and expression dimensions of language in the form of disarrays in reading,
listening, and speaking skills. Accordingly, it is expected to be difficult to comprehend the sentences with multiple verbs and multiple valencies
of verbs. The present study aimed to compare the syntactic perception of sentences with one divalent verb, sentences with one trivalent verb,
and two–verb sentences in patients with Broca's aphasia.
Methods: The present study was descriptive and cross–sectional research. Forty–five patients with Broca's aphasia were selected based on a
convenience research method. The patients were selected from those who were referred to the neurotrophy center of Tehran University in Tehran
City, Iran. They were recognized as patients with Broca's aphasia according to the diagnosis of a neurologist and the confirmation of Nilipour’s
Aphasia Naming Test (2011). The study subjects included those with Broca's aphasia and agrammatism due to a brain injury in the left
hemisphere with the diagnosis of a neurologist and the confirmation based on the aphasia test. Patients under pharmacotherapy were excluded
from the current study. The required data were collected using a researcher–constructed demographic questionnaire, including the following
variables: age, educational level, mother tongue, and dominant hand. We also used the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System Test (Delis et
al., 2001), covering sentences with divalent verbs, sentences with trivalent verbs, and two–verb sentences for assessing the syntactic
comprehension in Iranian patients with aphasia. Data analyses were carried out using Dependent Samples t–test at a significance level of 0.01.
Results: The mean±SD comprehension values of one–verb sentences with divalent verbs, like active sentences was 3.71±1.06. The mean±SD
comprehension scores of inverted sentences, subjective attributive sentences, and objective attributive sentences were 3.62±0.96, 3±1.11, and
3.65±1.21, respectively. Besides, the mean±SD comprehension scores of one–verb sentences with trivalent verbs, such as ablative sentences and
inverted ablative sentences were 2.88±1.01 and 2.85±1.15, respectively. Finally, the lower averages for the mean±SD comprehension values of
two–verb sentences, such as connected sentences with relative pronouns, subjective relative sentences, and objective relative sentences were
2.8±1.26, 2.11±1.05, and 2.18±1.2, respectively. The Dependent Samples t–test results indicated a significant difference between the
comprehension of sentences with divalent verbs and sentences with trivalent verbs (p<0.001, t=11.18). Furthermore, there were significant
differences between the comprehension of one–verb sentences with divalent verbs and two–verb sentences (p<0.001, t=5.91) as well as one–
verb sentences with trivalent verbs and two–verb sentences (p<0.001, t=7.69).
Conclusion: Patients with Broca’s aphasia understand monosyllabic sentences better than two–verb sentences and further suffer from the
comprehension of sentences with three–verb verbs and two–verb sentences, compared with singular verb two–verb sentences. Therefore, patients with Broca's aphasia encounter different impairments in understanding one–act and two–act sentences.
