پديد آورندگان :
سپانلو، سپيده دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد رودهن، تهران، ايران - گروه مشاوره , دوكانه اي فرد، فريده دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد رودهن، تهران، ايران - گروه مشاوره , جهانگير، پانته آ دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد رودهن، تهران، ايران - گروه مشاوره
كليدواژه :
رفتارهاي خوردن آشفته , كمال گرايي , راهبردهاي سازگار تنظيم هيجان , راهبردهاي ناسازگار تنظيم هيجان
چكيده فارسي :
زمينه و هدف: رفتارهاي خوردن آشفته يكي از مشكلاتي است كه سلامت روان دانشجويان را تحت‌تأثير قرار مي‌دهد و عملكرد روان‌شناختي آن‌ها را دچار اختلال مي‌كند؛ بنابراين هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر بررسي پيش‌بيني رفتارهاي خوردن آشفته براساس كمال‌گرايي و راهبردهاي سازگار و ناسازگار تنظيم هيجان بود.
روش بررسي: پژوهش به‌لحاظ هدف از نوع كاربردي و به‌لحاظ روش از نوع توصيفي-همبستگي و تبييني بود. شركت‌كنندگان اين پژوهش را 438 زن و مرد دانشجو تشكيل دادند كه براساس جدول كرجسي و مورگان (1970) با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گيري دردسترس از مراكز دانشگاهي سطح شهر تهران در سال 1398 انتخاب شدند. براي گردآوري داده‌ها، از آزمون بازخورد خوردن (گارنر و همكاران، 1982)، مقياس تجديدنظرشدهٔ كمال‌گرايي (اسلاني و همكاران، 2001) و ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎمهٔ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻫﻴﺠﺎن (ﮔﺎرنفسكي و كرايج، 2007) استفاده شد. تجزيه‌وتحليل داده‌ها با استفاده از ضريب همبستگي پيرسون و رگرسيون خطي چندگانه، به‌كمك نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخۀ 24 در سطح معناداري 0٫05 صورت گرفت.
يافته‌ها: نتايج نشان داد بين كمال‌گرايي (0٫259=r، 0٫001>p) و راهبردهاي ناسازگار تنظيم هيجان (0٫095=r، 0٫048=p) با رفتارهاي خوردن آشفته رابطۀ مستقيم و معناداري وجود داشت؛ همچنين متغيرهاي كمال‌گرايي (0٫259=β، 0٫001>p) و راهبردهاي ناسازگار تنظيم هيجان (0٫95=β، 0٫002=p) به‌صورت مثبت و معنادار توان پيش‌بيني رفتارهاي آشفتهٔ خوردن را داشتند.
نتيجه‌گيري: براساس نتايج پژوهش حاضر، افرادي كه كمال‌گرايي دارند و بيشتر از راهبردهاي ناسازگار تنظيم هيجان در زندگي بهره مي‌برند، بيشتر به رفتارهاي خوردن آشفته گرايش دارند؛ بنابراين انجام‌دادن اقدامات مناسب براي افزايش راهبردهاي سازگار تنظيم هيجان و كمال‌گرايي متعادل در اين افراد پيشنهاد مي‌شود.
چكيده لاتين :
Background & Objectives: Eating disorder behaviors are defined as clinically significant psychological or behavioral patterns, i.e., associated with eating or weight, as well as disorder, disability, or an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in individuals. Perfectionism is among the
factors that could predict disordered eating behaviors. Perfectionism is a personality trait associated with striving to be impeccable, with high standards of unrealistic and self–critical behaviors. Another characteristic that may be involved in eating disorders is Emotion Regulation (ER).
In other words, maladjustment in ER leads to disordered eating behaviors in individuals. ER strategies are classified into adaptive and
maladaptive classes. Given the high prevalence of eating disorder behaviors and the relationship between perfectionism and ER strategies, the
current study aimed to predict disordered eating behaviors based on perfectionism as well as adaptive and maladaptive ER strategies.
Methods: The present study was practical in terms of purpose and descriptive–correlational and explanatory concerning the method. The
statistical population of this study consisted of all male and female students of Islamic Azad University in Tehran City, Iran, in 2019. To
determine the sample size, 438 subjects were estimated based on Krejcie and Morgan’s table (1970). The research participants were selected
using the convenience sampling method. The inclusion criteria of the study were as follows: being a student; living in Tehran; providing consent
to participate in the project, and no use of drugs, including psychotropic medications. The exclusion criteria of the research included not being a
student; not living in Tehran; the lack of consent to voluntarily participate in the research, and the use of any drugs, including psychotropic
medications. The required data were collected using the Eating Attitudes Test (Garner et al., 1982), the Almost Perfect Scale–Revised (APS–R)
(Slaney et al., 2001), and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski & Kraaij, 2007). Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple linear
regression analysis were used in SPSS at the significant level of 0.05 for data analysis.
Results: The obtained results revealed a direct and significant relationship between perfectionism and eating disorder behaviors (r=0.259,
p<0.001). Additionally, a significant and direct relationship was found between maladaptive ER strategies and disturbed eating behaviors
(r=0.095, p=0.048). However, there was no significant relationship between adaptive ER strategies and eating disorder behaviors (r=–0.042,
p<0.376). Furthermore, the results of multiple linear regression analysis suggested that perfectionism (β=0.259, p<0.001) and maladaptive ER
strategies (β=0.95, p=0.002) could positively and significantly predict eating disorder–related behaviors. The achieved results also indicated that
30% of the variable changes in eating disorder behaviors were explained by perfectionism and maladaptive ER strategies.
Conclusion: The present study findings signified that individuals with perfectionism are more prone to use maladaptive ER strategies and tend
to present eating disorder–related behaviors. Therefore, it is recommended to take appropriate measures to improve adaptive ER strategies and balanced perfectionism in this group.
