پديد آورندگان :
سعادتي اناركي، سپيده دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي ابهر، ابهر، ايران - گروه مشاوره , پويامنش، جعفر دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي ابهر، ابهر، ايران - گروه روان شناسي , قمري، محمد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي ابهر، ابهر، ايران - گروه مشاوره , جعفري، اصغر دانشگاه كاشان، كاشان، ايران - گروه روان شناسي
كليدواژه :
تاب آوري , دارو درماني , متادون , تصويرسازي ذهني هدايت شده , اعتياد
چكيده فارسي :
زمينه و هدف: امروزه وابستگي به مواد، از مشكلات بسيار مهم مربوط به سلامت عمومي در جوامع به‌شمار مي‌رود. تاب‌آوري مي‌تواند در درمان معتادان نقش مؤثري داشته باشد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعيين اثربخشي تصويرسازي ذهني هدايت‌شده و تركيب آن با دارودرماني در تاب‌آوري معتادان تحت درمان انجام شد.
روش بررسي: روش پژوهش نيمه‌آزمايشي با طرح پيش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون و پيگيري با گروه گواه بود. نمونه‌اي شامل سي نفر از معتادان كلينيك درمان اعتياد زندگي سبز به‌روش نمونه‌گيري دردسترس انتخاب شدند. سپس به‌طور تصادفي در گروه‌هاي آزمايش و گواه (پانزده نفر در گروه آزمايش تصويرسازي ذهني هدايت‌شده همراه با دارودرماني (متادون) و پانزده نفر در گروه گواه) قرار گرفتند. جمع‌آوري دادهها در مراحل پيش‌آزمون، پس‌آزمون و پيگيري در هر دو گروه، مقياس تاب‌آوري كانر-ديويدسون (كانر و ديويدسون، 2003) بود. تصويرسازي ذهني هدايت‌شده براساس برنامۀ آموزشي مالتز (2002) براي گروه آزمايش انجام شد؛ اما براي گروه گواه هيچ مداخله‌اي ارائه نشد. به‌منظور تحليل دادهها از روش تحليل كوواريانس و تحليل واريانس با اندازه‌گيري مكرر در نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخهٔ 22 استفاده شد. سطح معناداري آزمون‌ها 0٫05 درنظر گرفته شد.
يافته‌ها: نتايج نشان داد، تصويرسازي ذهني هدايت‌شده در تركيب با دارودرماني، در تاب‌آوري معتادان تحت درمان مؤثر بود (0٫001>p)؛ همچنين اثر اصلي زمان بر متغير تاب‌آوري معنادار به‌دست آمد (0٫001>p و 2288٫83=F). اين نتيجه نشان مي‌دهد كه در نمره‌هاي تاب‌آوري بين سه دوره‌ٔ زماني مختلف در گروه آزمايش تغيير وجود داشت. مقدار مجذور اتا براي تاب‌آوري در اثر اصلي زمان نشان داد، 98٫8درصد از واريانس متغير تاب‌آوري به‌وسيلهٔ مداخله‌ٔ صورت‌پذيرفته تبيين شده است.
نتيجه‌گيري: باتوجه به يافته‌هاي پژوهش استفاده از تصويرسازي ذهني هدايت‌شده با تركيب دارودرماني تأثير مثبتي در تاب‌آوري معتادان تحت درمان دارد.
چكيده لاتين :
Background & Objectives: The world is facing the pervasive crisis of drug abuse. Substance dependence, directly and indirectly, degrades moral foundations in the affected individuals. Among these consequences are increased crime and violence rates. Pharmacological interventions
provide promising short–term outcomes; however, they are associated with difficulties due to non–compliance with treatment and long–term maintenance of drugs. Besides, these patients are prone to relapse following the discontinuation of pharmacotherapy. Psychotherapy is not in conflict with pharmacotherapy; rather, it can complement them. Therefore, drug treatment methods, i.e., more common than other approaches
in Iran, are imperfect unless used in combination with other methods. Recognizing treatment methods, like Guided Imagery (GI) along with
medications, as well as helping to treat substance dependence and improve resilience to substance use are of significance. Thus, the present study
aimed to explore the effects of GI adjunct to pharmacotherapy on resilience in substance–dependent patients under treatment.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and a control group design. The statistical population of this study
consisted of all patients with substance dependence who were under treatment with a medical record at substance abuse treatment clinics in
Tehran City, Iran, in 2017. In total, 45 subjects recruited from the Green Life Living Treatment Clinic were selected by a convenience sampling
method and randomly assigned into the experimental and control groups (n=15 in the experimental GI training group; n=15 in the experimental
GI group adjunct to methadone therapy; 15 controls). The inclusion criteria of the study were as follows: clients admitted to the Green Life
Addiction Treatment Clinic in Tehran City, in 2017; not receiving individual counseling or psychotherapy; no history of medication use;
participation in GI sessions, and no recurrence episode. The exclusion criteria included female gender; neurological disorders (as per self–
expression & medical records), and presenting too much stress (self–expression of the subject based on stress); no history of recurrence and
failure of treatment (the dissatisfaction of the subject to continue treatment). Data collection tools consisted of the Conner–Davidson Resilience
Scale (Conner & Davidson, 2003) and GI technique package (Maltz, 2002). Initially, resilience, craving, and tendency to use drugs were tested
and controlled by the subjects of the research groups (pretest). Then, the GI program was conducted in the experimental and control groups in
combination with their drug therapy in eight 45–minute sessions for two months. At the end of the intervention sessions, resuming questionnaires,
the craving and tendency to substance abuse were provided to the research subjects. Subsequently, the relevant data were collected (posttest).
To analyze the obtained data, descriptive and inferential statistics, including Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and repeated–measures
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were used in SPSS. The significance level of the tests was considered 0.05.
Results: The present research results suggested that GI in combination with pharmacotherapy was effective in the resuscitation of treated drug
users (p<0.001). Additionally, the main effect of time on resilience was significant (p<0.001, F=2288.83). Therefore, there was a change in
resilience scores between 3 different time intervals in the experimental group. The value of the Eta–squared for resilience in the main effect of
time indicated that 98.8% of the variance of resilience was explained by the provided intervention.
Conclusion: The obtained data indicated that GI, both alone and in combination with pharmacotherapy, was effective in resuscitating and reducing the craving and re–use of substance in substance–dependent patients receiving treatment.
