پيامدهاي اجتماعي حرمت ربا در اقتصاد مقاومتي از منظر آيت الله خامنه اي

The social consequences of usury in the resistance economy from the perspective of Ayatollah Khamenei

پژوهش حاضر درصدد است تا پيامدهاي اجتماعي حرمت را در الگوي اقتصاد مقاومتي مورد بررسي قرار دهد. بنابراين سوال پژوهش حاضر اين است كه پيامدهاي اجتماعي حرمت ربا در اقتصاد مقاومتي شامل چه مواردي است؟ به عبارتي، كاربست نفي و حرمت ربا در اقتصاد مقاومتي، چه نتايج اجتماعي در پي دارد؟ فرضيه نوشتار اين است: مقابله با تكاثر ثروت و نفي فاصله طبقاتي، مبارزه با ظلم و فساد در جامعه و همچنين پيشگيري از عدم تعادل در نظام اجتماعي از جمله پيامدهاي اجتماعي حرمت ربا در اقتصاد مقاومتي از نظر آيت الله خامنه اي هستند. نتايج نشان مي دهد، اگر شيوه هاي اقتصادي جامعه بر مبناي ربا تداوم يابند، مشكلات و مسايل اجتماعي از جمله فاصله طبقاتي، اشرافيت و تجمل گرايي، انحرافات در نظام اجتماعي و همچنين رذايل اخلاقي بر امور تسلط مي يابند. همچنين دين اسلام بر مبناي اعتدال و عدالت محوري بنا شده است و ربا از بين برنده عدالت و اعتدال است. از بين بردن آثار اجتماعي ربا نيازمند از بين بردن اين شيوه در مناسبات اقتصادي افراد جامعه است كه امروزه وظيفه دستگاه قضايي است كه بتواند، تحقق بخش سياست هاي كلي اقتصاد مقاومتي باشد. اجرايي كردن بانكداري بدون ربا يكي از راهكارهاي اساسي براي نفي و حرمت ربا در جامعه اسلامي است. پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از روش توصيفي-تحليلي صورت گرفته است.

In the Islamic school of economics, usury has been declared one of the most reprehensible economic methods and forbidden, and the same approach has been considered in other Islamic economic systems, including the resistance economy. On the other hand, considering that every economic system has social dimensions, the present study seeks to examine the social consequences of respect in the model of resistance economy. Therefore, the question of the present study is what are the social consequences of usury in a resistance economy? In other words, what are the social consequences of using negation and sanctity of usury in a resistance economy? The hypothesis of the article is: counteracting the multiplication of wealth and denying class distance, fighting oppression and corruption in society and also preventing imbalances in the social system are among the social consequences of usury in the resistance economy according to Ayatollah Khamenei. The results show that economic models play an important role in society and if the economic practices of society based on usury continue, social problems and issues such as class distance, aristocracy and luxury, deviations in the social system and moral vices on affairs. They master. Also, the religion of Islam is based on moderation and justice, and usury destroys justice and moderation. Eliminating the social effects of usury requires eliminating this method in the economic relations of individuals in society, which today is the duty of the judiciary, which can be a part of the general policies of the resistance economy by referring to the principles of the constitution and acting on religious rulings. Implementing interest-free banking is one of the basic strategies for denying and sanctifying usury in the Islamic society. The present study was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method and citing books and articles related to the discussion and especially referring to the statements of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Khamenei.