كليدواژه :
ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ , ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﮐﯿﻔﯽ , اﯾﺪه ﭘﺮدازي , روﯾﮑﺮد آﻣﯿﺨﺘﻪ , ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ رﺷﺪ
چكيده فارسي :
ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮان ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ اﯾﺪه ﭘﺮدازي ﺑﺮ ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎي ﺗﻮﺳـﻌﻪ ﮐﯿﻔـﯽ ﻣﺮاﮐـﺰ رﺷﺪ ﺑﺎ روﯾﮑﺮد آﻣﯿﺨﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ اﺟﺮا درآﻣﺪ. روش ﭘـﮋوﻫﺶ از ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻫـﺪف، ﺑﻨﯿـﺎدي و از ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻧﺤـﻮه ﮔﺮدآوري اﻃﻼﻋﺎت در دو ﺳﻄﺢ ﮐﯿﻔﯽ، روﯾﮑـﺮد اﺷـﺘﺮاوس وﮐـﻮرﺑﯿﻦ)1998( و ﮐﻤﯽ)ﺗﻮﺻـﯿﻔﯽ از ﻧـﻮع ﭘﯿﻤﺎﯾﺸﯽ( ﺑﻮد. ﺟﺎﻣﻌـﻪ آﻣـﺎري ﭘـﮋوﻫﺶ ﺷـﺎﻣﻞ ﮐﻠﯿـﻪ ﻣـﺪﯾﺮان ﺷـﺮﮐﺖﻫﺎي داﻧـﺶ ﺑﻨﯿـﺎن ﻣﺴـﺘﻘﺮ در داﻧﺸﮕﺎهﻫﺎي اﺳﺘﺎن ﺗﻬﺮان و اﺻﻔﻬﺎن در ﺳﺎل 1398 ﺑﻮد. اﺑﺰار ﺟﻤﻊ آوري اﻃﻼﻋـﺎت در ﺑﺨـﺶ ﮐﯿﻔـﯽ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎرﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮد ﮐﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ اﻃﻼﻋﺎت آن ﺑﻪ ﺷﯿﻮه ﮐُـﺪ ﮔـﺬاري)ﺑﺎز، ﻣﺤـﻮري و اﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺑﯽ( روي ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ اي ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﺑﺮ15 ﻧﻔﺮ ﺻﻮرت ﮔﺮﻓﺖ و در ﺑﺨﺶ ﮐﻤﯽ اﺑﺰار اﺻـﻠﯽ ﺳـﻨﺠﺶ، ﭘﺮﺳﺸـﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺤﻘـﻖ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮد. ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎي ﺣﺪاﻗﻠﯽ ﻧﺮم اﻓﺰار ﮐﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﺮﺑﻌﺎت ﺟﺰﺋﯽ ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ3 ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧـﻪ در ﺑﺨـﺶ ﮐﻤـﯽ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ 50 ﻧﻔﺮ در ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﮐﻪ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ اﯾﺪه ﭘﺮدازي ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺷـﺮاﯾﻂ ﻋﻠّـﯽ ﺑﺎ6 ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ)ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺳﺎزﻣﺎﻧﯽ، ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ آﻣﻮزﺷـﯽ، ﻋﻮاﻣـﻞ ﻣـﺎﻟﯽ، اﻟﮕﻮﻫـﺎي ارﺗﺒـﺎﻃﯽ، ﮐـﺎر ﺗﯿﻤـﯽ اﺛـﺮﺑﺨﺶ، ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻘﺎت ﺑﺎزار(، ﺷﺮاﯾﻂ زﻣﯿﻨﻪ اي ﺑﺎ 3 ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ اﺻﻠﯽ)ﮐﺎرﮐﺮد، اﻗﺘﺼﺎد، ﻗﻮاﻧﯿﻦ( و ﺷﺮاﯾﻂ ﻣﺪاﺧﻠـﻪ ﮔـﺮ ﺑـﺎ4 ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ)ﺣﻤﺎﯾﺖ، ﺗﻮاﻧﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎزي، ﻧﮕﺮش، ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ رﻓﺘﺎر ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ( ﺑﺮﭘﯿﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎي ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﮐﯿﻔﯽ ﻣﺮاﮐـﺰ رﺷـﺪ در 5 ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ اﺻﻠﯽ)اﺷﺘﻐﺎل ﻏﻨﯽ و ﺗﻘﻮﯾﺖ ﺷﺪه، رﺷﺪ ﮐـﺎرآﻓﺮﯾﻨﯽ، ﻣـﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ اﺳـﺘﻌﺪاد، ﺑﺎزارﯾـﺎﺑﯽ ﻋﻠﻤـﯽ و ﻫـﻢ اﻓﺰاﯾﯽ ﻣﻠﯽ( ﺗﺎﺛﯿﺮ داﺷﺘﻪ و ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ اوﻟﯿﻪ ﻣﺪل ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﮐﯿﻔﯽ ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ رﺷﺪ داﻧﺸﮕﺎهﻫـﺎي ﮐﺸـﻮر ﺑـﺮ اﺳـﺎس ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﻫﺎي ﯾﺎد ﺷﺪه ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت اﻟﮕﻮي ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﯽ ﺗﺪوﯾﻦ و ﺗﻔﺴﯿﺮ ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ.
چكيده لاتين :
The present study was conducted aimed to analyze the effect of ideation development factors on the consequences of qualitative development of growth centers using mixed approach. The research method was fundamental in terms of purpose and also in terms of how to collect information at two levels of quality, the Strauss and Corbin (1998), and quantitative (descriptive survey type) approach. The statistical population of the study included all managers of knowledge-based companies located in the universities of Tehran and Isfahan provinces on 2019. The data collection tool was structured in the qualitative part of the interview, analyzed by coding (open, axial and selective) on a sample of 15 people, and in the quantitative part of the main assessment tool, a researcher-made questionnaire was developed. Based on the software minimum, the smallest partial intelligent squares of the sample size in the quantitative part of the research were considered to be 50 people. The results showed that the factors of ideation development include causal conditions with 6 components (organizational context, educational factors, financial factors, communication patterns, effective teamwork, market research), contextual conditions with 3 main categories (function, economy, rules), and conditions. The interventionist with 4 categories (support, empowerment, attitude, and analysis of interaction behavior) had a significant effect on the quality development outcomes of growth centers in 5 main categories (rich and enhanced employment, entrepreneurial growth, talent management, scientific marketing, and national synergy) and the initial theory of the qualitative development model of growth centers of the country's universities was compiled and interpreted as a conceptual model based on the mentioned categories.