ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ ﻫﺎي دﻻﺋﻞ ﻧﮕﺎري ﻧﺒﻮي (ص) در ﮐﺘﺎب أﻋﻼم اﻟﻨﺒﻮه اﺛﺮ اﺑﻮﺣﺎﺗﻢ رازي

A Study of the Components of Dalaelgraphy of Nabavi (PBUH) in the book A'lam al-Nabwa by Abu Hatem Razi

دﻻﺋﻞﻧﮕﺎري در ﺳﯿﺮة ﻧﺒﻮي)ص( ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﮔﺰارشﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﻣﯽﭘﺮدازد ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮر وﯾﮋه ﺑﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎي ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺒﺮي ﺣﻀـﺮت ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ص( ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان دﻟﯿﻠﯽ ﺑﺮاي اﺛﺒﺎت ﻧﺒﻮﺗﺶ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﮐﺰ ﺷـﺪه اﻧﺪ. ﻧﻮع ﭘﺮداﺧﺘﻦ اﯾﻦ ﻧﻮﯾﺴــﻨﺪﮔﺎن ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎي ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺒﺮي ﺣﻀــﺮت ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ص(، ﻧﺸــﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﯾﯽ در اﯾﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ از ﺳـﯿﺮهﻧﮕﺎري ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﻣﻮرد ﺗﻮﺟﻪ آﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻮده، و اﯾﻦ اﻣﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ زﯾﺎدي ﺑﺮ اﺳـﺎس ﻣﮑﺘﺐ ﮐﻼﻣﯽ و ﯾﺎ ﺣﺪﯾﺜﯽ اﯾﻦ ﻧﻮﯾﺴـﻨﺪﮔﺎن ﺻـﻮرت ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳـﺖ. اوﻟﯿﻦ اﺛﺮي ﮐﻪ از اﻧﺪﯾﺸـﻤﻨﺪان اﺳـﻤﺎﻋﯿﻠﯽ در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮع اراﺋﻪ ﺷـﺪه، ﮐﺘﺎب أﻋﻼماﻟﻨﺒﻮه اﺛﺮ اﺑﻮﺣﺎﺗﻢ رازي )م322 ق ( اﺳـﺖ. ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ ﺑﻪ روش ﺗﻮﺻـﯿﻒ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ و ﺑﺎ ﺗﮑﯿﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪاي در ﭘﯽ ﭘﺎﺳـﺨﮕﻮﯾﯽ ﺑﻪ اﯾﻦ ﺳـﻮال اﺳـﺖ ﮐﻪ اﺑﻮﺣﺎﺗﻢ رازي ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﯾﮏ ﻣﺘﮑﻠﻢ ﻣﺸـﻬﻮر اﺳـﻤﺎﻋﯿﻠﯽ، ﺑﻪ ﮐﺪام ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎي دﻻﺋﻞﻧﮕﺎري ﻧﺒﻮي ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﺎن داده و آﯾﺎ از اﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﯾﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎن ﻏﯿﺮاﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻠﯽ ﺗﻔﺎوﺗﯽ دارد ﯾﺎ ﻧﻪ؟ ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ اﺑﻮﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﺴـــﯿﻢ ﺑﻨﺪي ﻧﺸـــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎي ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺒﺮي ﺣﻀـــﺮت ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻪ دﻻﺋﻞ و ﻣﻌﺠﺰات ﻓـﺎﻋﻠﯿـﺖ ﭘﯿـﺎﻣﺒﺮ را در اﯾﻦ اﻣﺮ ﺑـﻪ ﻃﻮر ﺧـﺎص ﻣﻮرد ﺗﻮﺟـﻪ ﻗﺮار داده و از اﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺸـــﺎﺑـﻪ ﻣﺘﮑﻠﻤـﺎن و ﻣﺘﻔﺎوت از ﻣﺤﺪﺛﺎن ﻋﻤﻞ ﮐﺮده اﺳـــﺖ. اﻫﻤﯿﺖ و ﺿـــﺮورت اﻧﺠﺎم اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ در اﯾﻦ ﻧﮑﺘﻪ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﮐﺘﺎب اﺑﻮﺣﺎﺗﻢ رازي، ﮐﻬﻦ ﺗﺮﯾﻦ اﺛﺮ اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻠﯽ در ﻣﻮﺿﻮع ﻣﻮردﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﻮده و ﺗﺎﮐﻨﻮن از ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻮع ﻧﮕﺎه او ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺠﺰات و ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎي ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺒﺮي ﺣﻀــﺮت ﻣﺤﻤﺪ )ص(، ﻣﻮﺿــﻮع ﻫﯿﭻ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻘﯽ ﻗﺮار ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ.

Dalaelgraphy of Nabavi (PBUH) examines books that focus specifically on the signs of the prophethood of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as evidence for his prophethood. The way these writers deal with the prophetic signs of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) shows what components of the Prophet's biography are of interest to them in this genre, and this is largely based on the theological or hadith school. These authors are done. The first work of Ismaili thinkers on this subject is the book by Abu Hatem Razi (322 AH).The present study seeks to answer the question that Abu Hatam Razi, as a prominent Ismaili theologian, has paid attention to which components of prophetic reasoning and whether he is different from other non-Ismaili writers in this regard or not? The answer obtained shows that the Ismaili views on prophetic reasoning were not significantly different from the authors of other schools, including muhaddithin, Zaidi theologians, Mu'tazilites, and Ash'arites. The importance and necessity of this research lies in the fact that the book of Abu Hatem Razi was the oldest Ismaili work on the subject and so far no research has been done on this subject.