فرآيند تدقيق عنوان پژوهش مسئله-محور و بوم-خاست دكتري در ايران: تعريف پژوهش پيرامون "خاطره جمعي" در شهر ايراني

The Process of Exploring the Indigenous Ph.D Research Topic in the Iranian Interdisciplinary Sciences

ﺷﯿﻮه اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﻣﻮﺿﻮع ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ دﮐﺘﺮي ﺗﺨﺼﺼﯽ ﺑﻪ وﯾﮋه در ﻋﻠﻮم اﻧﺴﺎﻧﯽ و داﻧﺶ ﻫﺎي ﻣﯿﺎن رﺷﺘﻪ اي ﻧﻈﯿﺮ ﻣﻌﻤﺎري، ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ رﯾﺰي و ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﻬﺮي ﻫﻤﻮاره دﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﮕﺮان ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺎوﺟﻮد ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﭘﺮاﮐﻨﺪه روش ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﯽ، ﺳﺮﮔﺮداﻧﯽ در ﻃﺮح ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﯽ ﺧﻮرد و اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﻣﻮﺿﻮع ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎً ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎه ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ اي ﺑﻪ ﭘﯿﺸﯿﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻫﺎي ﺳﺮزﻣﯿﻨﯽ دﯾﮕﺮ ﺻﻮرت ﻣﯽ ﭘﺬﯾﺮد. درﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ دﯾﺎﻟﮑﺘﯿﮏ ﻋﺎم و ﺧﺎص ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ )آﻣﻮﺧﺘﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم ﺟﻬﺎن ﺷﻤﻮل و ﻗﺮار دادن آن در ﻇﺮف ﻣﺤﻠﯽ( و رﻋﺎﯾﺖ اﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﻣﯽ در ﻃﺮح ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎت ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ ﻣﻮرد ﮐﻢ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﯽ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ و اﺗﺨﺎذ ﻣﺒﻨﺎي روش ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺘﻮاﻧﺪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﻀﻤﯿﻦ دﯾﺎﻟﮑﺘﯿﮏ ﻋﺎم و ﺧﺎص، ﺑﻪ ﺷﮑﻞ ﮔﯿﺮي ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ ﺑﻮم-ﺧﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﻮد، ﻣﻐﻔﻮل ﻣﯽ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ. ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﻓﺮآﯾﻨﺪ ﺗﺪﻗﯿﻖ ﻋﻨﻮان ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ دﮐﺘﺮي ﺑﺎ روﯾﮑﺮد ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ- ﻣﺤﻮر و ﺑﺎ اﺣﺘﺮام ﺑﻪ اﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﺳﺮزﻣﯿﻨﯽ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ اﻧﺠﺎم ﮔﺮدﯾﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺪﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮر در اﯾﻦ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎر، ﺿﻤﻦ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﺎﻫﯿﺖ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ دﮐﺘﺮي و ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ اﻧﻮاع ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، ﺑﻪ دﯾﺎﻟﮑﺘﯿﮏ ﻋﺎم و ﺧﺎص ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ و ﺿﺮورت اﻧﺠﺎم ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ- ﻣﺤﻮر و ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﻓﺮآﯾﻨﺪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ واﺟﺪ ارزش ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ ﭘﺮداﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺳﺮاﻧﺠﺎم، ﯾﮏ ﭼﺎرﭼﻮب روش ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﯽ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ اي در اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ و ﺗﺪﻗﯿﻖ ﻋﻨﻮان ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ دﮐﺘﺮي ﭘﯿﺸﻨﻬﺎد ﮔﺮدﯾﺪه و ﻣﺪل روش ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﯽ ﭘﯿﺸﻨﻬﺎدي، در اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﻣﻮﺿﻮع ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ دﮐﺘﺮي ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎزي ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن " ﺧﺎﻃﺮه ﺟﻤﻌﯽ" ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎر ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ.

The method of choosing the PhD research topic in Iranian interdisciplinary sciences has always been one of the concerns of researchers. Today, the research problems have been resulted from a confusing choice and the topic choice is made mainly by a translational look at the scholarly literature of the other contexts. So, the dialectic of the universal and the particular of research (acquiring global knowledge and then localizing it) have been neglected and the adoption of a methodological basis that can confirm indigenous originality of the research, is overlooked. This study aims at explaining the process of exploring the PhD research topic in Iranian context by adopting a problem-based approach. A five-step methodological framework in defining the PhD research title has been proposed and the proposed model has been used in the case of selecting the topic of Urban Planning PhD research around the general topic of "collective memory".According to the process presented in the paper, research title formulation should pass through the five stages including "Finding the research-worthy problems based on the four-step process (look, read, synthesize and seek feedback)", "Introducing the problems and outlining the concise proposals concerning them", "Evaluating and choosing 2/3 subjects meeting the quadruple criteria (clarity of research questions, research originality and importance, contribution to the knowledge, have a sense of belonging to the subject)", "Seeking key questions by the “method of making conceptual linkage between questions/ concepts”" and "Finally choosing the subject and formulating the research title after an integral synthesis".