بررسي رابطه رويكرد منظر تاريخي شهري با زيست پذيري شهري

The Relationship between Urban Historical Landscape Approach and Urban Livability

ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ »ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ راﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﯿﻦ روﯾﮑﺮد ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ ﺷﻬﺮي ﺑﺎ زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮي ﺷﻬﺮي« ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. اﺻﻄﻼح زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮي اﺷﺎره ﺑﻪ درﺟﻪ ﺗﺄﻣﯿﻦ ﻣﻠﺰوﻣﺎت ﯾﮏ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎي ﻧﯿﺎزﻫﺎ و ﻇﺮﻓﯿﺖ اﻓﺮاد آن ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ دارد. روش ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﻣﻮرداﺳﺘﻔﺎده، روش ﭘﯿﻤﺎﯾﺸﯽ و اﺑﺰار ﮔﺮدآوري اﻃﻼﻋﺎت ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺮاه ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ. ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ آﻣﺎري ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ، ﮐﻠﯿﻪ ﺷﻬﺮوﻧﺪان 18 ﺳﺎﻟﻪ و ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺳﺎﮐﻦ در ﺷﻬﺮ اﯾﻼم ﺗﻌﺮﯾﻒ ﺷﺪه اﻧﺪ و ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻓﺮﻣﻮل ﮐﻮﮐﺮان ﺗﻌﺪاد 383 ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ و ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﯿﻮه ﺧﻮﺷﻪ اي ﭼﻨﺪﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ اي ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺠﻢ اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪه اﻧﺪ. اﻋﺘﺒﺎر ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ از ﻃﺮﯾﻖ اﻋﺘﺒﺎر ﻣﺤﺘﻮا ﺑﺎ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﮐﻞ )0/833( و ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ اﺑﺰار از ﻃﺮﯾﻖ آﻟﻔﺎي ﮐﺮوﻧﺒﺎخ ﺑﻪ ﻣﯿﺰان )0/828( ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮ رﺿﺎﯾﺖ از زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮي ﺷﻬﺮي و )0/824( ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮ روﯾﮑﺮد ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ ﺷﻬﺮوﻧﺪان ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. در ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ داده ﻫﺎ از ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﭘﯿﺮﺳﻮن، ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ رﮔﺮﺳﯿﻮن ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮه اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﮔﺮدﯾﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ و ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎي ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺣﺎﮐﯽ از آن اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ رﺿﺎﯾﺖ از زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮي اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي )49/10(، ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ رﺿﺎﯾﺖ از زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮي اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ )55/00( و ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ رﺿﺎﯾﺖ از زﯾﺴﺖ ﭘﺬﯾﺮي زﯾﺴﺖ ﻣﺤﯿﻄﯽ )32/66( ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ.

The present article aims at studying the relationship between urban historical landscape approach and urban livability. The term viability refers to degree of meeting society requirements based on people’s needs and capacity in that society. Environmental pollution with external sources, ethnicity, reducing social capital, reducing sense of belonging to location, being surrounded by mountains, speculation, lack of viable land in Ilam city have faced it with challenges. This study aims at recognizing effective factors on Ilam viability. Research method in this study is survey. Sampling and data gathering is done through questionnaire and interview. Statistical population is all eighteen-year-old an over Ilam citizens and according to Cochran formula 383 people have been selected as sample size. In theoretical elements of the research, approaches of urban geography, urban economy, urban planning, and urban sociology have been used. The research findings showed that average economical viability satisfaction is (49.1), average social viability satisfaction is (55), and average environmental viability satisfaction is (32.66).