مقدمه: با توجه به شيوع بالاي عهدشكني در روابط زناشويي و عواقب جبرانناپذير آن طراحي، اجرا و مقايسه اثربخشي مداخلات متعدد از ضروريات پژوهشهاي امروزي در اين زمينه است. اين مطالعه با هدف مقايسه اثربخشي زوجدرماني هيجان مدار و زوجدرماني شناختي رفتاري بر صميميت زناشويي زنان آسيبديده از عهدشكني صورت گرفت.
روش پژوهش: در اين مطالعه كه به روش نيمه تجربي صورت گرفت جامعه آماري اين پژوهش شامل تمامي زناني ميشد كه بعد از تجربه عهدشكني همسر در بازه زماني سهماهه اول سال 1399 به مركز مشاوره مراجعه كردند. از اين جامعه آماري 45 نفر به روش مبتني بر هدف بر اساس معيارهاي ورود به مطالعه انتخاب و در سه گروه بهصورت تصادفي جايگزين شدند. گروه اول 15 نفر كه زوجدرماني شناختي رفتاري را دريافت ميكردند، گروه دوم با حجم 15 نفر كه زوجدرماني هيجان مدار را دريافت ميكردند و گروه سوم كه گروه گواه بود كه هيچ مداخلهاي دريافت نكردند. هر سه گروه قبل و بعد و دو ماه بعد از مداخله با مقياس صميميت (MIS) واكر و تامپسون ارزيابي شدند. دادههاي بهدستآمده با روشهاي آماري آناليز واريانس دادههاي تكراري تجزيه تحليل شدند.
يافتهها: يافتهها نشان داد زوجدرماني شناختي رفتاري و زوجدرماني هيجان مدار در صميميت زناشويي تفاوت معناداري با گروه كنترل دارند (0.001
چكيده لاتين :
Introduction: Due to the high prevalence of contract in marital relationships and its irreparable consequences, the design, implementation and comparison of the effectiveness of various interventions is one of the necessities of modern research in this field. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of emotion-focused couple therapy and cognitive-behavioral couple therapy on marital intimacy of women affected by infidelity.
Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, the statistical population of this study included all women who referred to a counseling center after experiencing a breach of contract in the first quarter of 2020. From this statistical population, 45 people were selected by purposive method based on inclusion criteria and randomly replaced in three groups. The first group consisted of 15 patients receiving cognitive-behavioral couple therapy, the second group consisted of 15 patients receiving emotion-oriented couple therapy, and the third group received control group who did not receive any intervention. All participants were assessed before, after, and two months after the intervention with the Walker and Thompson (1983) Intimacy Scale (MIS). The obtained data were analyzed by statistical methods of analysis of variance of duplicate data.
Results: The results showed that cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and emotion-oriented couple therapy in marital intimacy were significantly different from the control group (P <0.001). Emotion-focused couple therapy showed higher effectiveness (P <0.05).
Conclusion: According to the findings, although cognitive-behavioral couple therapy has increased intimacy between couples, but emotive couple therapy has been more effective in
increasing the marital intimacy of betrayed women; Therefore, it is suggested to use emotionoriented techniques to improve the relationship between the betrayed couple. Also, considering
the effectiveness of both treatments, an integrated approach can be used in future studies.