پديد آورندگان :
رمضاني، حميدرضا دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد امارات - دانشكده معماري و شهرسازي - گروه شهرسازي، دبي، امارات , خانلو، نسيم دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد تهران شرق - دانشكده معماري و شهرسازي - گروه معماري، تهران، ايران , سلطان زاده، حسين دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد تهران مركزي - دانشكده معماري و شهرسازي - گروه معماري، تهران، ايران
كليدواژه :
توسعه ميانافزا , مشاركت ساكنان , كيفيت فضاي شهري , سرمايهگذاري عاملان , محله سنگلج تهران
چكيده لاتين :
Introduction: Today in growing cities, the focus is on developing the existing neighborhoods through
infill development. Infill development is indeed a type of development that, in contrast to other urban
development policies, is made on the existing urban infrastructure and in the presence of the citizens and
neighboring units. Sangelaj neighborhood, as a part of the historical body of Tehran city, is a worn-out
urban texture (urban decay texture). The emergence of different problems in this field, such as reduced
quality of life and human development indices, lack of full enjoyment of services and dwelling (house)
among resident families, …, has attracted the attention toward the use of the infill development by
reviving the existing capacities of the neighborhood as a worn-out texture. The present study is aimed to
identify the factors affecting the realization of infill development in three dimensions of space quality,
residents' contribution, and investment of stakeholders in this neighborhood.
Methodology: The study uses the analytical-descriptive correlational method. Case study is the Sangelaj
neighborhood in District No.12 of Tehran. The study population included 3 groups: residents, capital
owners, and passing people. The sample size was estimated as 378 individuals for residents, 83
individuals for capital owners, and 384 individuals for passing people, who were selected by stratified
sampling from all three groups using the randomized convenience sampling method. Data collection
was performed using three researcher-made questionnaires (for residents, capital owners, and passing
people). Then, the collected data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, regression, AHP, and
clocklike binary comparison methods.
Results: Among all factors (i.e., space quality, contribution, and investment), space quality is the most
critical factor in infill development. Among the factors affecting the space quality, space dynamism with
a coefficient of 0.830, security with a coefficient of 0.349, and sports spaces and facilities with a
coefficient of 0.136 affected the space quality in this neighborhood. Among the factors affecting the
residents' contribution, neighboring relationships with a coefficient of 0.709 were the most important
factors directly related to the residents' contribution. Next to it, trust in the government, interaction with
the neighborhood council, the tendency for living in the neighborhood after reconstruction, and
economic profit were the factors that were placed on the following ranks, respectively. Furthermore,
among the factors affecting private investment, license issuance loan with a coefficient of 0.568 was the
most critical factor directly related to the tendency for investment. Also, house construction loan and
incentive density were the other factors that were placed on the following ranks, respectively.
Conclusion: in order to improve regions with low attractiveness for reconstruction, it is necessary to
adopt the infill development approach and the low tendency for construction (in terms of spatial quality,
residents' contribution, and house construction loans).
