پژوهشنامه انتقادي متون و برنامه هاي علوم انساني

Review of the book of Hussein Ibn Musa (AS) Life, personality, tomb

نوشتار حاضر به بررسي كتاب حسين بن موسي (ع) زندگاني، شخصيّت، آرامگاه تأليف علي اخوان­مهدوي پرداخته است. بررسي اين كتاب به صورت انتقادي و با استناد به منابع گوناگون عرضه شده است. نويسندۀ كتاب از تحليل مطالب كتب انساب و حديث به خلاّقيت­هاي مهمّي دست يافته است چنان كه از خلال بررسي پيشينۀ پژوهش اين نوشتار مي­توان سطح بالاتر اين كتاب نسبت به آثار پيشين با موضوع پژوهش را دريافت؛ امّا با وجود اين، نوشتار حاضر، نخست، اين اثر را معرّفي و چهارچوب شكلي و محتوايي آن را توصيف و بررسي و سپس، هم در مورد شكل و هم در مورد محتوا اشكالات و پيشنهادهايي را ارائه كرده است. بررسي كتاب اخوان مهدوي نشان داد كه اگر چه اين كتاب مزاياي متعدد دارد و بر آثار پسين نوشته شده در اين موضوع، موثر بوده است اما كاستي‌هايي چون نبود پيشينۀ پژوهش و نقد منابع، استفادۀ اندك نويسنده از منابع حديثي و رجالي و ضعيف بودن برخي استنادات نويسنده از اعتبار كتاب كاسته است.

Hussain ibn Musa ibn Jafar is a famous Alawi person who transmitted some Hadiths from his father Imam Musa al Kazim and his brother, Imam Ali ibn Musa al Rida (A.S). This lofty position and proximity to the Imamate line, caused the construction of some attributed Sepulchers to him in many cities, of which Tabas, located in the east of Iran, has more fame. Ali Akhavan Mahdavi has written a book on this important personality, his life, and his real place of burring. The present study aims to examine the book critically, therefore, tries to introduce and examine the book, then discusses some problems in it and presents suggestions regarding both the form and the content. So, we prepare our study with the use of a descriptive-analytical approach and of course a special usage of the main historical sources to which compare the contents of them. In conclusion, the author reached some important innovations in comparison with similar sources and studies, and it is completely clear by analyzing the content of hadith and genealogy books. Examination of the Akhavan Mahdavi's book showed that although this book has many advantages and has been effective on subsequent works written on this subject, but shortcomings such as lack of research background and critique of sources, the author's little use of Hadith and Rijal sources are among the cons. Some of the author's citations have diminished the book's credibility.