تطبيق قاعده فقهي تنفير از دين در عرصه سياست داخلي و خارجي حكومت اسلامي

Application of the jurisprudential rule of hatred of religion in the field of domestic and foreign policy of the Islamic government

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسي تطبيق قاعده فقه ي تنفير از دين در عرصه سياست داخلي و خارجي است. بدين معنا كه اعمال و كاركرد حكومت به چه نحوي بايد باشد كه در عرصه سياست داخلي و خارجي باعث رويگرداني از دين اسلام نشود. سؤال قابل طرح اين است: مؤلفه ­هاي قاعده فقه ي تنفير از دين در عرصه سياست داخلي و خارجي شامل چه مواردي است؟ پاسخي كه مي­توان به اين سؤال داد اين است: مفاد قاعده «حرمت تنفير از دين» محدوده وسيعي از احكام الزامي و غيرالزامي، از عرصه ­هاي فردي و اجتماعي، سياسي و نظامي، اقتصادي و قضائي را شامل مي­شود و هرچه موجب تنفير از دين شود را حرام مي­داند. نتيجه­ اي كه از اين بحث گرفته مي­شود اين است كه كاركرد حكومت اسلامي به عنوان نماينده و مجري احكام اسلامي نبايد به نحوي باشد كه باعث تنفير از دين و رويگرداني از آن در داخل و خارج از مرزهاي نظام اسلامي باشد. در خارج از مرزهاي اسلامي، اصل احترام به تعهدات و قراردادها، رابطه مسالمت­ آميز و مبتني بر احترام با جنگ زدگان، اسراء و آسيب­ ديدگان جنگي از جمله رويكردهايي است كه مي­تواند بهره­ گيري از قاعده فقهي مزبور را به ما نشان دهد. روش مورد استفاده در پژوهش حاضر، توصيفي-تحليلي و بهره ­گيري از آراء و منابع فقهي است.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the application of the jurisprudential rule of hatred of religion in the field of domestic and foreign policy. This means that the actions and functions of the government should be such that it does not turn away from Islam in the field of domestic and foreign policy. The question that can be asked is: what are the components of the jurisprudential rule of hatred of religion in the field of domestic and foreign policy? The answer that can be given to this question is: the provisions of the rule of "sanctity of hatred of religion" include a wide range of mandatory and non-mandatory provisions, from the personal and social, political and military, economic and judicial spheres, and whatever It is forbidden to cause hatred of religion. The conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that the function of the Islamic government as a representative and executor of Islamic rules should not be in a way that causes hatred of the religion and turning away from it inside and outside the borders of the Islamic system. Outside the Islamic borders, the principle of respect for obligations and contracts, peaceful and respectful relationship with war victims, prisoners of war and victims of war is one of the approaches that can show us the use of this jurisprudential rule. Give. The method used in the present study is descriptive-analytical and using jurisprudential opinions and sources.