عنوان مقاله :
ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﻓﻘﻬﯽﺣﻘﻮﻗﯽ ﻣﺼﺎدره ي اﻣﻮال در ﺟﺮاﺋﻢ داروﯾﯽ
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Jurisprudential Legal Explanation of Confiscation of Property in Drug Crimes
پديد آورندگان :
ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ، ﺳﻌﻴﺪ دانشگاه تهران - دانشكده‌ي الهيات - گروه فقه و مباني حقوق اسلامي، تهران، ايران , ﻋﺰﻳﺰﺍﻟﻠﻬﻲ، ﺣﺠﺖ دانشگاه تهران - دانشكده‌ي الهيات - گروه فقه و مباني حقوق اسلامي، تهران، ايران
كليدواژه :
ﺟﺮﺍﺋﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻳﻲ , ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﻩﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ , ﻓﻘﻪ , ﺩﺍﺭﻭ
چكيده فارسي :
ﺟﺮﺍﺋﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻳﻲ، ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺴـﺎﺭﺕﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼـﺎﺩﻱ، ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷـﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺳـﻼﻣﺖ ﺍﺷـــﺨﺎﺹ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﮐﻨﺪ؛ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ، ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﻱ ﻣﺆﺛﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ، ﻣﺼـﻤﻢ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ. ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ، ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ ﻣﺼـﺎﺩﺭﻩﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ، ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﮐ ﻴﻔﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﺍﺋﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ؛ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲﮐﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻓﻘﻬﻲ، ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭﺳـﺖ. ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺗﻮﺻـ ﻴﻔﻲﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳـﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ، ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺬﺍﺭ، ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩﻱ 18 ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﭘﺰﺷـــﮑﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺷـــﺎﻣﻴﺪﻧﻲ، ﻣﺼــﺎﺩﺭﻩﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ، ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﺍﺋﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻳﻲ، ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ. ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﻘﻬﻲ ﻫﻢ، ﺍﻧﺴـﺎﻥ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ، ﺣﻖ ﻣﺎﻟﮑﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ، ﻣﺎﻟﮑـﻴ ﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴـــﺖ ﻭ ﺑـﻨﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺷـــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺼـــﺎﻟﺢ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ، ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺼـﺎﺩﺭﻩﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ، ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷـﻮﺩ؛ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﺮﻁ ﺁﻧﮑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﮑﺎﺏ ﺟﺮﺍﺋﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻳﻲ، ﺍﺟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ.
چكيده لاتين :
Drug crimes, regardless of the economic consequences, have threatened
public and individual health and determined the international community to
combat them effectively. Therefore, in the laws in question, confiscation of
property is considered as a punishment for criminals of drug crimes; while
from a jurisprudential point of view, this punishment has faced challenges.
The findings of the present study performed using descriptive-analytical
method and based on library sources show that the legislator has accepted
the confiscation of property as a punishment for some drug crimes in article
18 of the Law on Medical and Pharmaceutical and Food and Beverage
Regulations. According to jurisprudence, although man has the right of
ownership over his property and assets, it does not mean he is absolute
owner. According to special circumstances and assuming the existence of
public interests, this right can be ignored in the form of confiscation of
property provided that other deterrents to committing drug offenses are not
applicable.
عنوان نشريه :
اخلاق و تاريخ پزشكي
