عنوان مقاله :
ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼت ﻧﻮع ﮐﺎر، ﺟﻨﺴﯿﺖ و ﺟﺬاﺑﯿﺖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮي ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺮﺳﺎن ﺑﺮ ﻗﻀﺎوت و درك رﻓﺘﺎرﻫﺎي ﻏﯿﺮاﺧﻼﻗﯽ
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Investigating the Effect of Interaction of Job Type, Gender and Apparent Attractiveness of Auditors on Judging and Understanding Immoral Behaviors
پديد آورندگان :
ﻣﺤﻤﺪي ﯾﺰدي، ﻣﮋﮔﺎن داﻧﺸﮕﺎه آزاد اﺳﻼﻣﯽ واﺣﺪ ﯾﺰد - ﮔﺮوه ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺪاري، ﯾﺰد، اﯾﺮان , ﺣﯿﺮاﻧﯽ، ﻓﺮوغ داﻧﺸﮕﺎه آزاد اﺳﻼﻣﯽ واﺣﺪ ﯾﺰد - ﮔﺮوه ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺪاري، ﯾﺰد، اﯾﺮان
كليدواژه :
رﻓﺘﺎر ﻏﯿﺮاﺧﻼﻗﯽ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺮﺳﺎن , ﺟﺬاﺑﯿﺖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮي , ﻗﻀﺎوت رﻓﺘﺎر ﻏﯿﺮاﺧﻼﻗﯽ , ﺟﻨﺴﯿﺖ
چكيده فارسي :
ﻗﻀﺎوت اﺧﻼﻗﯽ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ اﺳﺎﺳﯽ در ﻓﺮاﯾﻨﺪ ﺗﺼﻤﯿﻢ ﮔﯿﺮي اﺧﻼﻗﯽ اﺳﺖ و ﻣﻘﺪم ﺑﺮ ﻗﺼﺪ و رﻓﺘﺎر اﺧﻼﻗﯽ اﺳﺖ. ﺑﻪ ﺑﯿﺎن دﯾﮕﺮ، ﺗﻮاﻧﺎﯾﯽ ﺗﺸﺨﯿﺺ و ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﯿﺖ ﻫﺎي ﭘﯿﭽﯿﺪة اﺧﻼﻗﯽ در زﻣﺎن ﺗﺼﻤﯿﻢ ﮔﯿﺮي، ﭘﯿﺶ ﻧﯿﺎز رﻓﺘﺎر اﺧﻼﻗﯽ اﺳﺖ. در ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﻫﺎي ﺣﻮزة اﺧﻼق، ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﯿﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻗﻀﺎوت اﺧﻼﻗﯽ، ﺑﯿﺶ از ﺳﺎﯾﺮ ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. از اﯾﻦ رو ﻫﺪف اﺻﻠﯽ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮﻫﺎي ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼت ﻧﻮع ﮐﺎر، ﺟﻨﺴﯿﺖ و ﺟﺬاﺑﯿﺖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮي ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺮﺳﺎن ﺑﺮ ﻗﻀﺎوت و درك رﻓﺘﺎرﻫﺎي ﻏﯿﺮاﺧﻼﻗﯽ ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﺟﺎﻣﻌﮥ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﺷﺪه، ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺪاران و اﻓﺮاد ﻏﯿﺮﺣﺴﺎﺑﺪار ﺷﺎﻏﻞ در ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﻫﺎي دوﻟﺘﯽ و ﺷﺮﮐﺖ ﻫﺎي ﺧﺼﻮﺻﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ دﺳﺘﺮﺳﯽ ﻧﺪاﺷﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ آﻣﺎر دﻗﯿﻖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﮥ ﻣﺬﮐﻮر، از ﻓﺮﻣﻮل ﮐﻮﮐﺮان ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ اﻗﺪام ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ و در ﻧﻬﺎﯾﺖ ﺗﻌﺪاد 384 ﻧﻔﺮ اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽ دﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻗﻀﺎوت ﮐﺎرﻫﺎي ﻏﯿﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﯽ در ﻣﺮدان ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ از زﻧﺎن ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ. از ﻃﺮﻓﯽ ﺟﻨﺴﯿﺖ در ﻗﻀﺎوت رﻓﺘﺎرﻫﺎي ﻏﯿﺮاﺧﻼﻗﯽ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎداري ﻧﺪاﺷﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﺑﺎ اﻓﺰاﯾﺶ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺟﺬاﺑﯿﺖ، ﻣﯿﺰان ﻗﻀﺎوت ﮐﺎرﻫﺎي ﻏﯿﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﯽ ﮐﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﯽ ﯾﺎﺑﺪ. از ﻃﺮﻓﯽ ﺟﻨﺴﯿﺖ در درك ﮐﺎرﻫﺎي ﻏﯿﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﯽ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎداري داﺷﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ.
چكيده لاتين :
Ethical judgment is a fundamental factor in the moral decision-making process and precedes
moral intent and behavior. In other words, the ability to recognize and evaluate complex
ethical situations when making decisions is a prerequisite for ethical behavior. In ethical
research, the effect of gender on moral judgment has been studied more than other variables.
Therefore, the main purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of variables of
work type, gender and apparent attractiveness of auditors on judging and understanding
immoral behaviors. The study population are accountants and non-accountants working in
organizations and companies. Due to the lack of accurate access to the statistics of the
community, Cochran's formula is used to determine the sample and finally 384 people are
selected. The results show that men are more likely to judge illegal acts than women. On the
other hand, gender has not had a significant effect on judging immoral behaviors. Also, as the
level of attractiveness increases, the rate of judging illegal acts decreases.
عنوان نشريه :
پژوهش هاي مالي و رفتاري در حسابداري