وﯾﮋﮔﯽﻫﺎي ﺧﺎص ﮐﺎري اﻓﺮاد در ﻧﯿﺮوي ﻧﻈﺎﻣﯽ ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ و ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ اﯾﻦ اﻓﺮاد اﺛﺮﮔﺬار ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ و ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ﭘﺎﯾﻮران ﯾﮏ ﻧﯿﺮوي ﻧﻈﺎﻣﯽ و ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﺪ. روشﻫﺎ: ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ اي ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ- ﻣﻘﻄﻌﯽ در ﺳﺎل 1396 اﺳﺖ. ﭼﻬﺎرﺻﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ از ﭘﺎﯾﻮران ﯾﮏ ﻧﯿﺮوي ﻧﻈﺎﻣﯽ از ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎي ﺑﻨﺪرﻋﺒﺎس، ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ و ﻣﺎﻫﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ روش ﺗﺼﺎدﻓﯽ ﺳﺎده ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻣﻌﯿﺎرﻫﺎي ورود و ﺧﺮوج ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. اﺑﺰار ﮔﺮدآوري اﻃﻼﻋﺎت ﯾﮏ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮدﮔﺰارﺷﮕﺮ و ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺟﻤﻌﯿﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﯽ، ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ 36 ﮔﻮﯾﻪ اي 36-SF و ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ 28-GHQ ﺑﻮد. در ﭘﺎﯾﺎن، داده ﻫﺎ وارد ﻧﺮم اﻓﺰار SPSS ﻧﺴﺨﻪ 16 ﺷﺪﻧﺪ و ﺑﺎ آﻣﺎر ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ )ﻓﺮاواﻧﯽ، ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ و اﻧﺤﺮاف ﻣﻌﯿﺎر( و ﻧﯿﺰ آﻣﺎر ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ ﻫﻤﭽﻮن آزﻣﻮنﻫﺎي ﺗﯽ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ، ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ ﯾﮏ و ﭼﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ و ﻧﯿﺰ آزﻣﻮن ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﮐﯽ ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ: ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﮐﻪ ﭼﻬﺎرﺻﺪ ﻓﺮد ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ داراي ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ و اﻧﺤﺮاف ﻣﻌﯿﺎر ﺳﻨﯽ )34/09 (6/41 ﺳﺎل ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ. از ﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﯽ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺮد و داراي )153/73 (85/93 ﻣﺎه ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﮐﺎري ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﮐﻪ ﻧﻤﺮات ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﭘﺎﯾﻮران در ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﺮار دارد. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﻧﻤﺮات ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ﻧﺸﺎن دﻫﻨﺪه وﺿﻌﯿﺖ ﻃﺒﯿﻌﯽ و ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻋﻼﺋﻢ ﻣﺮﺿﯽ ﺑﻮد. در زﯾﺮ ﻣﻘﯿﺎسﻫﺎي ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ، ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﺟﺴﻤﯽ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ و درد ﺟﺴﻤﯽ ﭘﺎﯾﯿﻦﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ را داﺷﺖ. ﮐﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﻧﻤﺮات در ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ در زﯾﺮ ﻣﻘﯿﺎس ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ اﻓﺴﺮدﮔﯽ ﺑﻮد. ﻧﻤﺮات ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﺑﺎ ﮐﻠﯿﻪ ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮﻫﺎي ﺟﻤﻌﯿﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ درﺟﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﯽ راﺑﻄﻪ آﻣﺎري ﻣﻌﻨﺎدار داﺷﺖ )0/05 < P( و ﻧﻤﺮات ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﺎ اﮐﺜﺮﯾﺖ ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮﻫﺎي ﺟﻤﻌﯿﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﯽ ﺑﻪ وﯾﮋه ﺑﺎ ﻣﯿﺰان درآﻣﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ راﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎدار آﻣﺎري داﺷﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ )0/50
چكيده لاتين :
The specific characteristics of people's work in the military force can affect the general
health and quality of life of these people. The aim of this study was carried out to assess the quality of life and
general health of the personnel of a military force and effective factors.
Methods: The present research is a descriptive cross-sectional study in 2017. Four hundred members of a
military force were selected by simple random sampling based on inclusion and exclusion criteria from Bandar
Abbas, Bushehr and Mahshahr cities. The data collection tools included a self-report questionnaire consisting of
three as demographic characteristics, a 36-item (SF-36) and a GHQ-28 general health questionnaire. Finally, the
data were entered into SPSS software version 16 and it examined with descriptive statistics (frequency, mean and
standard deviation) and also analytical statistics such as independent t-test, one-way ANOVA and Tukey test for
multiple comparisons.
Results: The results showed that Staffs quality of life scores were moderate. Also, the average of general
health score had a normal condition without symptoms. On the quality of life subscales, pain and physical function
had the highest and lowest mean, respectively. The lowest average score in subscale’s depression in general health.
There was a statistically significant relation between the quality of life score and all demographic variables except
military-grade (P<0.05). General health score had a significant relation with the majority of demographic
variables, especially the Participant’s income level (P <0.05).
Conclusion: It seems that training and supportive measures are needed to maintain and improve the existing
conditions. The military environment, due to its special circumstances, requires wise and more precise
management to maintain the core assets, which are its manpower. Therefore, according to the demographic and
social factors affecting the dependent variables of quality of life and general health of staffs should be supported
by programs.