و سنتي بر ميزان رضايت دانشجويان پرستاري OSCE مقايسه دو روش ارزشيابي باليني

Comparison Between Two Methods: Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) and Traditional on Nursing Studentsʹ Satisfaction

Introduction: Evaluation is the last stage of educational activities, and clinical practice is an important part of nursing education and the evaluation of nursing clinical practice is essential in overall evaluation. Objective: This study was carried out to compare two methods of clinical evaluation (OSCE and traditional) on nursing studentsʹ satisfaction. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive comparative study, all the nursing students of Rasht nursing faculty who were trained in pediatric wards were randomly divided into two groups, one group evaluated by OSCE, and other group by traditional method. Then, in order to determine the effect of evaluation methods, studentsʹ satisfaction was checked through a satisfaction form. Data were gathered by checklists for nine stations, satisfactory rating scale on 6 domains and traditional evaluation form. Results: The highest rate of studentsʹ satisfaction in all domains belonged to OSCE group (P<0005). Conclusion: OSCE can evaluate nursing studentsʹ clinical skills more than the other methods and can trigger more satisfaction among them.