تفاوت جوهري نظريه فارابي و ابن رشد در تطبيق بين حكمت و شريعت

The Essential Difference between Farabiʹs and Ibn-Rushdʹs Theories on the Compatibitlity of Hikamt and Shariʹat

After the appearence of the philosophy in the field of Islamic culture, the feeling of cantradiction between religion and philosophy made Muslem thinkers take different Positions. Some of them left philosophy behind themselves and rejected it, and a few of them preferred philosophy to religion, but a thinker as Farabi founded a new philosophical school in which the Revelation was considered as knowledge, which was expressed in philosophical method. And therefore it became clear that the wisdom and religion had the same origin, and there was no contradication between them. After Farabi, Avecien competed his theory and increased important elements to it but Averose, because of his dogmatic emphasis on Aristotalian philosophy, revived it. The philosophy which Averose revived was irrelevant to the spitit of Islamic philosophy. and was not capable of philosophyical expression of Revelation as supernatural and unexperimental knowledge. And despairingly of his philosophy, by reliance of juristic and theological presuppositions, in his book named "Fast al Maghal" his attempt was unsuccessful for connection between wisdom and religion, which has been criticized in present essay.