ارزيابي برنامه جامع توسعه منطقه زاگرس مركزي

Evaluation of Centeral Zagros comprehensive plan

Regional planning in Iran have a long period background. In spite of this background of 50 years old, these plans have less and less reached to implementation stage. The aim of this study is analysis of comprehensive development plan of Central Zagros Region. The main reason for selection of this subject for evaluation, firstly was the importance of regional planning, especially in a expand country like Iran , and the second, was necessity of continoues analysis and review on the plans in both cases of aims and methods. This research in its evaluation process , initially tried to answer to the three following questions: 1-The rate of compatibility between the plan and scientific bases 2-Harmony and answering between the aims and the targets of initial contract of the plan 3-The rate of applicability and implementation of recommended plan. Methodology of research in this thesis is the descriptive and analytical method, and is divided on two sections: One is formal evaluation and the other is containing evaluation Formal evaluation is to compare of such cases of the survey that is out of purport, and only concentrate on formal part of the work The aim of containing evaluation, is indeed to analysis and evaluate such part of survey that has the considerable meaning , and is comparable with the scientific terms and literature review of regional planning Output of the research -in short- is that In typical regional plans -in general- and the case of the recommended plan of Central Zagros -in special- the formal methods of planning are done in a fair level. But the matter on which is in a neglect, is not to pay enough attention to initial stage and also last stage of planning process, that means: how to be philosophical and ideological terms of planning at the first and how to execute or to program the plan at the end of planning process . In other words, the regional plans are suffered from two things more than the others; "Poverty in Theory and Poverty in Execution