كليدواژه :
انقلاب اسلامي , RELIGION , مذهب , توسعه , World War II , ايران
چكيده لاتين :
After the World War II, different views regarding the Third World development have been presented, one of which is the Modernization School as one of the dominant schools in this field. In this article, new ideas in the developmental studies have been referred while the school is being touched and criticized. In these notions, historical and occasional study of countries is underlined to make a presentation of suitable strategies for the development of the societies concerned and the role of native values, particularly religion as one of the effective factors on the individualsʹ action has been favored.
Further in the article, allusion has been made to a study of different outlooks given for the strategy of development in Iran after the revolution. They are classified under two categories, the Neo-Modernization and native-religious perspectives of development, the latter of which, as the writer puts, overlaps more with the new theories on development with an increased conceptual support. But the same perspective in responding to the question, "how much does religion contribute to the objectives or development strategies in Iran?" is sub-divided into three notions one of which, according to the writer, is only empowered to theorize the principles of native development in the country, having more force of overlapping with the national and religious features as well as with the international system, that the perspective once being supported and strengthened can culminate in a stable, legitimate, and long-standing development in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
