پديد آورندگان :
معطري، مرضيه نويسنده دانشكده پرستاري و مامايي حضرت فاطمه (س)-دانشگاه علوم پزشكي شيراز Moatari, M , رمضاني، سميه نويسنده گروه داخلي و جراحي دانشكده پرستاري و مامايي حضرت فاطمه (س)-دانشگاه علوم پزشكي شيراز RAMEZANI, S
كليدواژه :
ديدگاه , محيط يادگيري باليني , تجربيات باليني , دانشجويان پرستاري
چكيده لاتين :
Introduction: The prosperity of nursing educational programs depends on the cfficienrv and sl(fjidefl(lʹ (~I
clinical experiences. One of the most important factors recognized in this field is learning environment. ln
this study. different aspects otclinicol environment hove been evuluatedtrom studentsʹ viewpoints.
Methods: All interns attaining clinical experiences in the wards ofpediatrics, nenrosurgical KʹU, !YʹCOHʹIY,
surgical JCU, surgical emergencies, men medical emergencies, and obstetrics and gvnecology took par! in
this descriptive cross-sectional study. Data gathering tool HʹQS a 50 item questionnaire developed through
combining two questionnaires ofclinical learning environment scale and clinical learning environment and
supervision, Students assessed their clinical environment hy completing this questionnaire during the se( ond
semester (~( 2006-2()()7 academic year, Data ~ras analyzed bv SPSS sottwarc using A)\rOVA and Post-hoc
tests in order to compare the means ofth« ranks.
Results: The mean qjʹghʹcn ranks to the learning environment ofdifferent wards variedfrom 1.4 tu 4.1 out (d
five. Four wards of surgical emergencies, male medica! emergencies, pediatrics and recovery received a
score (?(3 or less while, other 3 wards had a score between 3 and 4, Tile evaluated wards were dU(erellt in (i
ofthe variables including management pattern ofward administrator, learning in the ward, the commitment
of nursing supervisor, the manner 0/ communication with patient, the relationship between personnel and
students, and studentsʹ satisfaction. But, no significan: difference was observed in nursing studentsʹ perception
ofthe wardʹs atmosphere, the status ofnursing care, and interpersonal and supervision relationships in
different wards.
Conclusion: From the studentsʹ viewpoints, learning environment and its refuted variables \ʹWT ill di/Jere!!1
wards. More attention has to he paid to the quality" improvement ofdifferent wards