پديد آورندگان :
باقري خليلي، علي اكبر نويسنده دانشكده علوم انساني-دانشگاه مازندران Bagheri, A.A. , كيخا، موسي نويسنده دانشكده علوم انساني-دانشگاه مازندران Keikha, M
كليدواژه :
رياكاري , عيب جويي و مدرسه , انتقادات اخلاقي- اجتماعي , حافظ، شمس الدين محمد , Hiifez of Shiraz , Hypocrisy , Breach of Promise , Faultfinding , school , عهدشكني
چكيده لاتين :
At the time of Mongolʹs invasion, the Caliph of Baghdad
and King of Kharazrn were so occupied with their plan for
development of political power that hardly noticed Mongolʹs
invasion and were overthrown later on by them which
eventually culminated in the obliteration of a substantial part
of Islamic civilization. The Mongolʹs extorted peopleʹs
properties, raped women and lived lecherous lives. They put
heavy tax on people and established the system of serfdom,
sharing with ministers, chiefs, jurists and wealthy people. In
such a context, poverty and destitution were both important
factors in spreading hypocrisy, greed and immorality.
However, such a condition lasted relentlessly till the advent of
feudalism so that lechery, hypocrisy and darkness permeated
the entire community. Shiraz once ruled by al-e-Injoo and al-e
Mozafar and also once under the reign of Teimour was not
immune to such anarchy and state of chaos. By the same
token, Hafez who was born and grew up in Shiraz witnessed
such insecurity, hypocrisy, crime and disorder. He was deeply
touched by that condition and felt sick at heart. He was
discontent with the condition, but did not put the blame on the
ordinary people. Instead, he put the blame on the socio- political leaders and those who were in charge of religious,
cultural and social institutions, particularly the kings, judges,
mystics and jurists. He knew that such basic principles of
Islamic-Iranian culture as order, freedom and security were at
stake whose cause he attributed to ambitious kings, greedy
and hypocrite clergies and injustice of judges, Such an
instability of governments brought him a forward-looking
perspective and made him more far-sighted. His natural
tendency to freedom and the mood of slyness (rendi)
provoked him to criticize social behavior and values of the
above social classes such as hypocrisy, infidelity, betrayal,
breach of promise, faultfinding, etc, which is the main
concern of the present paper.