پديد آورندگان :
صادقي، منصوره سادات نويسنده دانشكده علوم تربيتي و روان شناسي-دانشگاه شهيد بهشتي , , حيدري، محمود نويسنده دانشكده علوم تربيتي و روانشناسي- دانشگاه شهيد بهشتي ,
چكيده لاتين :
This research was designed and conducted to investigate student adolescentsʹ hierarchy of
value system in various child-rearing styles. 249 students ( 129 females and 120 males) were
selected through random multi-stage cluster method. The subjects responded to Value and
Child-Rearing Questionnaires. The fina l analysis of scores obtained by Freedman
nonparametric techniques showed significant differences in the hierarchy of values of the
subj ects who classifled their parentsʹ child-rearing style as responsive, permissive, or
authoritative. Yet, no significant difference was indicated (or the subjec ts with the
disorganized style class ification. The hierarchy of value system tor the subjects in the
responsive category was in the following order: national, socia l, family, religious, scienti fic,
individual, financial, artistic, political, and universal. For the subjects classitying their
parentsʹ style as permissive. the hierarchy was as follow: socia l. national, family, scientific,
religious, individual, artistic, financial. political, and universal; finally lor the authoritative
group, the order was: national, scientific, socia l, family, religious, individual, financial,
political, universal, and artist ic, The interesting point were the superior ranking of national,
family, social. and religious values and conversely the inferior placement of political and
universal in all child-rearing styles (except in the disorganized). Kruskal-Wallis test
indicated significant differences between various child-rearing styles in family, social,
artistic, religious, and national values. The highest ranked values were family, social,
religious. and national were related to the responsive child-rearing style; tbc high placement
of art in the hierarchy of values belonged to tbe permissive family,
