كليدواژه :
تغيير , مديران , مديريت تغيير , دانشگاه ها , ميزان اهميت , امور مختلف دانشگاه
چكيده لاتين :
The purpose of present study was to determine the aspects and domains of different affairs in university and the amount of changes in the recent 5 years. Moreover, it aimed at identifying the importance of these changes in an optimal situation from managersʹ perspective in IAU Branches zone 8with reference to change management. Through review of its related literature, 90 components were extracted. Applying factor analysis and expert judgment, theses components were reduced to 70 items in 9 aspects. Then, to analyze the amount of changes in these 9 aspects in the recent five years and also to identify how important it was for managers to cause changes in these aspects, a 70-item researcher-made questionnaire was compiled whose validity was checked through expert judgment and whose reliability through Cronbach a (more than 0.92). The population of research included all managers of IAU branches in zone 8 (chancellors and the deputies, deans and vice deans, and heads of departments) amounted to 395 out of whom 267 were selected using the formula for the size of the sample. Data were analyzed in SPSS software through methods in descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, standard deviation, mean, and median) and inferential statistics (ANOVA, Chi Square, Factor Analysis). The findings showed that the major aspects of university affaires could be divided into 9 aspects: management, Instruction, research, evaluation, information technologies, organizationʹs culture, financial affair, and the structure of the administrative affair. From the managersʹ perspective in 3 levels there was a significant difference between the observed frequencies of the recent changes in 9 aspects and the expected frequencies. However, it was of great importance for them to make changes in affaires like instructional, research, management, evaluation, and .... Hence, in recent 5 years, :he changes in these 9 aspects were interpreted as "very little" and "average". The maximum mean was related to the instructional processes in university and the minimum mean to use information technologies and telecommunications in different affairs in universities.
