بررسي برهان حكمت و تدبير از ديدگاه والتر استيس

A study of reasoning wisdom and design from Walter Staceʹs perspective

philosopher exclaims that The development and progress of science neither confirms religious beliefs nor has any negative effect on them. It is only a psychological passage that sometimes in spirit and soul of some human beings misrepresents the development of science and the immortality of religion. Trying to prove, stace criticises the any argument based on scientific premises and claims it is valueless. In this paper the phylosophical reasoning from the viewpoint of stace is criticised and considering its theoretical aspect the descriptive analysis is used. Rejecting perspective of scientists considering phylosophical and scerutinative reasoning on existence of God , stace claims his reasoning is based on two principles: a) endlees complexity of reasons and their cooperation. b) use of complex chain of reasons for valuable and useful affairs Stace believes one should not be deceived using words like ʹadjustʹ and ʹcooperationʹ in phylosophical reasoning , because every event in the word is almost exceedingly improbable. According to stace entities are divided into two sroups of useful and nonoseful and the hypotesis of God can only explain valid entites.