نقد و بررسي روايات"قليل الحديث" بودن امام سجاد(ع)

Criticizing the Claim that Imam Sajjad (A.S) Was Qalil-al-Hadith (from whom was narrated just a few Hadiths)

ايمّه معصومين(عليهم السلام) و از جمله امام سجّاد(ع)، با توجّه به منصب مهمّ الهي كه عهده‌دار بودند، در راستاي حفظ، رشد و نمو اسلام و نيز هدايت مردم، تلاش‌هاي بسيار نموده‌اند. از جمله آن تلاشها، سخنان و احاديث فراوان است كه با توجّه به فعاليت‌هاي گسترده آنها، كثير الحديث بودنشان امري انكارناپذير به نظر مي‌رسد؛ ولي همانگونه كه در تاريخ حديث گزارش شده، گاهي افرادي جهت تضعيف شخصي، حديثي جعل و يا از روي خطا و تدليس تغييراتي در متن حديث ايجاد كرده‌اند. در نتيجه مطلبي نادرست ارايه و به دست متاخرين رسيده و بر اين اساس قضاوتهاي نادرستي(بويژه از سوي خاورشناسان) ارايه شده است. نسبت به امام سجاد(ع) نيز، رواياتي با صفت "قليل الحديث" بودن جعل شده است. اين مقاله در صدد بررسي و نقد اين روايات و مبرّا دانستن آن حضرت، از صفت "قليل الحديث" بودن با ارايه ادّله گوناگون است.

Imams of Shiah and especially fourth Imam, Sajjad (A.S) due to their mission by Allah, in order to protect and spread the Islam and also to guide people have tried their best. Among the attempts they had made for these purposes are their Hadiths and narrations they presented and it is the case that they have narrated many hadiths because of their activities. However as we see in History of Hadith, there we find some persons that fornicated traditions or perhaps made changes in the text of the traditions and this was by mistake or even subreption (Tadlis, in Arabic). Hence we see that something wrong was made and received to later generation and then based upon these fornications there seems to be some unfair judgments (especially by Easterners). On Imam Sajjad also we find some Hadiths denoting that he was Qalil-al-Hadith. The present essay is to study these Hadiths and to claim that his presence was free of the charge of being Qalil-al-hadith