تبيين و بررسي شاخص‌هاي خودسازماندهي در سازمان تربيت بدني ايران

Identification of Self-organization Indicators and Description of Them in Iran hysical Education Organization (IPEO)

هدف تحقيق حاضر، توصيف خودسازمان‌دهي بر مبناي نظريه هاي آشوب و پيچيدگي، در سازمان تربيت بدني ايران است. در اين تحقيق 65 كارمند حوزه ستادي، 105 كارمند فدراسيون هاي ورزشي و 210 كارمند اداره‎هاي كل تربيت بدني استان هاي كشور شركت داشتند. ابزار اندازه گيري تحقيق، پرسشنامه محقق‎ساخته «سنجش خودسازمان‌دهي» روا و پايا بود كه تجانس دروني آن 91/0=? و ضريب ثبات آن 93/0=?، در سطح 05/0=? به-دست آمد. متغيرهاي مورد مطالعه، خودسازمان‌دهي و شاخص هاي آن در سه حيطه ساختار، رفتار و توانايي سازماني در سه گروه نمونه تحقيق بود. آزمون t تك گروهي نشان داد ساختار و توانايي سازماني خودسازمانده در فدراسيون ها و ادارات كل، بالاتر از ميانگين معيار (3=µ و 01/0 > p) است. ولي رفتار سازماني خودسازمانده در هر سه گروه، كمتر از حدّ مورد انتظار است (01/0 > p). به منظور مقايسه متغيرهاي مورد نظر در سه گروه، از روش تحليل واريانس يك طرفه استفاده شد. آزمون هاي تعقيبي نشان داد بين ميانگين هر سه گروه، در مقايسه هاي دو به دو اختلاف معني داري وجود دارد (001/0 > p). رگرسيون چند متغيري نيز نشان داد برخي شاخص هاي ساختاري بر شاخص هاي رفتاري و توانايي تاثير دارد و همچنين برخي شاخص هاي رفتاري بر شاخص هاي توانايي تاثيرگذار است.

Aim of this study was codifying the indicators of self-organization and description of them in Iran Physical Education Organization (IPEO). In this study, 65 employees of headquarters, 105 employees of sports federations and 210 employees of total Physical education departmentsʹ provinces participated. Measuring tool in this study was questionnaire of self-organization which verified by experts and filled out by employees of IPEO. Surveyed variables were self-organization and its indicators in 3 fields of: structure, behavior and organizational abilities in view of the employees. T test showed that structure and organizational abilities of the Self-organizer in sport federations and Total physical education departments in provinces was much more than was expected e.g. observed mean was more the criteria (u=3) mean (p < 0.01). However, organizational behavior of the self-organizer in all three groups was much less than expectation (p < 0.01). In order to compare the variables of all three groups, one way analysis of variance was utilized. Results showed that there is a significant difference between means of structure, behavior and organizational abilities (P < 0.001). LSD and Tamhane tests also showed a significant difference of a=0.05 in pair comparison. T test of 2 independent samples had meaningful difference between means of men and women samples in relation to autonomy of structure criteria, behavior and self-organization criteria. Multiple regression analysis showed that between complexity structures indicator with non-determinism behavior; openness and dynamics structure with autonomy and self reference behavior exists significant positive relationship. Also between the openness and dynamics structure; and the autonomy and self reference behavior with the emergence and dynamic equilibrium of organization ability exist significant positive relationship