فضاي معماري به مثابه منظر/ بازتعريف فضاي سنتي از نگاه منظر

Architectural space as Landscape/ Renegotiating of the traditional space from concept of landscape

اين مقاله قصد دارد با تكيه بر مفهوم فضا در برابر مفهوم منظر معضل برآمده از مباني و اصول پيشتازان هنر و معماري مدرنيسم قرن بيستم و ابزار عملي آنها در پروژه‌هاي معماري را نشان دهد. از اين نقطه نظر، بررسي اين مفهوم از فضا در معماري امروز نقش تعيين‌كننده‌اي را بازي مي‌كند و مستلزم تجديد نظر است. به بيان بهتر و به قول برجزيان (Borgesian)1 "تعريف دوباره فضا از طريق مفهوم منظر به عنوان يك مكانيسم، قادر است سامانه‌اي از روابط با محيط را بيان و ارايه كند كه در آن پروژه معماري و منظر به عنوان يك قياس در نظر گرفته مي‌شود".

The dilemma that we intend to reflect on the idea of space against the landscape is framed from the principles deriving from the artistic vanguards and modernism of the 20th century and their operational tools in the architectural project. From this perspective, the idea of space in architecture is presented as a paradigm and necessary argument of reflection, for which we propose a disjunction between the "concept of landscape" to the "idea of space" defined by the modern movement. A series of considerations concerning the concept of landscape, "Towards the landscape” as arguments and principles surrounding which arises the need to offer and to rethink a new sense of space as a landscape dimension. Review the idea of space from this point of view is determinant in the architecture and entails the need to rethink her, or better in the term Borgesian "Renegotiate her" through the concept of landscape as a mechanism able to articulate and propose a system of relations with the environment and the territory where the project of architecture and landscape acts as a device. Rethink the idea of space offering a new physical and conceptual dimension of the landscape itself according to our time. This search process required to renegotiate any code involving a brace of thought, action, obligation, or participation, and review, in turn, the concepts of representation of reality, paradigm of our convulsive, ephemeral and dynamic time. The territory and the city have come to become a copy of his representation of his maps and plans, including their imaginary. Their reality is in the cartographic representation as normative legal connection, thereby evading the presence of man. The landscape must be the result of the interaction between the coordination and social participation and the critical project. The relationship between systems of even heterogeneous elements among them, should be placed in sequence constitute a semantic unit. It is a fact that the landscape is changing in time, this is their main characteristics. The continual reinvention of landscapes is possible and necessary. The source or origins of our reinterpretation depend on our sensitivity to discover the working of the landscape colonizes or natural.