پاسخ شبهه مخالفت بني‌هاشم با امامت امام صادق

A respond to the fallacious argument of the opposition of Bani Hashim to the leadership of Imam Sadigh (p.h)

شيعه بر اين باور است كه امامتِ امامان اهل‏بيت: با نصوص صادره از پيامبر اكرم9 ثابت است؛ چونان‏كه امامتِ امامان پس از حضرت علي7 نيز با نصوص امام يا امامان پيشين ثابت است. «فيصل نور» از وهابيون معاصر، در كتاب «الامامه و النص» سعي كرده با گردآوري پاره‌اي از روايات موجود در برخي منابع شيعه، اعتقاد شيعه در موضوع صدور نص را مخدوش كند. نامبرده در بخشي از كتاب خود، با ذكر چهار شاهد روايي و يك شاهد تاريخي، مدّعي مخالفت بني‌هاشم با امامت امام صادق7 شده، و اين مخالفت‌ها را دليل بر فقدان نص بر امامت آن حضرت قلمداد كرده است. بديهي است براي مخالفت با امامتِ امام صادق7 احتمالات متعددي هوچون عواملِ معرفتي و نفساني از قبيل فقدان نص بر امامت ايشان، جهل به امامت ايشان، حسادت، ضعف معرفت و ناتواني در درك مصالح نهفته در افعال امام7 وجود دارد. در اين ميان گزينش احتمال فقدان نص از ميان احتمالات فوق، ترجيح بلامرجح است. از سوي ديگر، حاصل بررسي سندي و دلالي اخبار مورد استناد، و نيز بررسي شخصيت‌هاي مذكور در اين وقايع، اين است كه استدلال به احتمال فقدان نص بر امامت امام صادق7 نه ترجيح بلامرجح، بلكه ترجيح مرجوح است. واژه‌هاي كليدي: امامتِ امام صادق7، بني هاشم، الامامه و النّص، فيصل نور.

Shiʹa believes that the leadership (Imamah) of the Imams of Ahlulbayt (the household of the Prophet(p.h)) has been established by definitive texts expressed by the Prophet of Islam; as the leaderships of the Imams after Imam Ali which have been established with the definitive texts of the previous Imam or Imams. Feisal Noor, a Wahhabi scholar, gathering some traditions transmitted in Shiite sources and bringing them in his book, tried to challenge the belief of Shiʹa relating to the subject of the issuance of the definitive text. In a part of a chapter which is related to the leadership of Imam Sadigh and with mentioning four narrative evidences and a historical evidence, clamed the opposition of Bani Hashim to Imam Sadigh and considered these appositions as a reason for the lack of an affirmative text on leadership of that Imam. A general respond to this clam is that there are several cognitional and psychical agents that can be imagined for the opposition to the leadership of Imam Sadigh like the lack of an affirmative text on his leadership, ignorance about his leadership, envy, weakness of cognition and inability to comprehend the benefits hidden in the Imamʹs acts. Now, choosing the probability of the lack of an affirmative text from among the different probabilities is a making preference without a preference. Besides, the study of the chain of transmitters and the signification of the traditions that used as evidences and also the study of the people mentioned in these incidences prove that the argumentation based on the probability of the lack of the definitive text on the leadership of Imam Sadigh is not even giving preponderance without a preponderant but it is preferring the subordinate. Keywords: the affirmative texts on the leadership of Imam Sadigh, the opposition of Bani Hashim, al-Im?mah va al-nass, Feisal Noor