بررسي انتقادي نظريه حركت جوهري ملاصدرا

Critical Study about the Theory of Substantial Motion of Molla Sadra

اين مقاله در صدد است نظريه حركت جوهري ملاصدرا را مورد واكاوي قرار داده و انتقادات پيرامون آن را در حوزه دلايل، لوازم و آثار، آشكار و ناسازگاري‌هاي دروني آن را بازگو نمايد، علاوه برآن برخي تعارضات لوازم اين نظريه با نصوص ديني را نشان دهد. نظريه حركت جوهري در ناحيه دلايل با انتقادات جدي مواجه بوده تا جايي كه بزرگاني همچون علامه طباطبايي ضمن پذيرش اشكالات وارده خود به اقامه استدلال در اين مقام پرداخته‌اند، علاوه بر آن لوازم اين نظريه در مواجه با نصوص ديني مانند اصل معاد، اصل رجعت و خلقت پيشين ارواح از توانايي لازم در پاسخ به تعارضات مطرح ناتوان است.

Achievements of Mulla Sadra is based on acceptance of reality and Tshkyk there could i fact explain many philosophical and theological problems be effective, but gainst this paper seeks expression, and some questions answers that Mulla Sadra and Transcendent Wisdom fans they have also raised the question set observer to the evidence, both primary and results of movement is substantial. Achievement of this paper is that substantial movement in the area, more reasons have been questioned, although claiminig not to be denied because of inability to spend one hand and the most important questions surrounding the question of substantial movement of primary survival issue is substantial movement in the area and Nsvs religious harmony with this principle, especially its relationship with self and the emergence of quality physical resurrection is such an important issues, indicating the need to rebuild this effort is Mulla Sadra and his followers