بررسي انطباق طرح هاي توسعه و عمران جديد كشور با ويژگي هاي طرح ساختاري راهبردي

Studying about Adaptation New Master Plan with Specifications of Structural Strategic Plan (Case study: Mashhad’s Comprehensives Plan)

پژوهش حاضر با اتكا بر مفروض اصلي ضرورت ارتقا جايگاه الگوي ساختاري و راهبردي در نظام برنامه ريزي ايران، به منظور بررسي ميزان انطباق طرح توسعه و عمران (جامع) شهر مشهد با ويژگي هاي الگوي ساختاري-راهبردي صورت پذيرفته است. براي دستيابي به اين هدف، ابتدا ويژگي هاي الگوي ساختاري راهبردي در متون تخصصي كشور احصا شده و آنگاه وضعيت طرح جامع شهر مشهد با تكيه بر اين ويژگي ها مورد بررسي قرارگرفته است. به منظور تعيين چگونگي انطباق و يا عدم انطباق طرح جامع مشهد با ويژگي هاي الگوي ساختاري راهبردي از دو روش مطالعه اسنادي و پرسشنامه استفاده شد و نتايج دو بررسي مورد مقايسه قرار گرفته است. نتايج حاكي از آن است كه در مجموع طرح توسعه و عمران شهر مشهد با ويژگي هاي الگوي ساختاري –راهبردي انطباق ندارد و و بايد براي ويژگي هايي كه از وضعيت مطلوبي برخوردار نيستند بر اساس مباني نظري بومي؛ تدابيري انديشيده و تلاش ويژه اي مبذول گردد.

Spatial strategic planning systems have become the subject of mush comparative research in recent years. This has resulted in very general classification, while a definition of the subject of the comparison remaining vague. Any attempt at comparative evaluation has proved therefore to be difficult and controversial, impending further theoretical and institutional progress. Against this backdrop, the present contribution is aimed as an effort toward examination the practical experience of using structural strategic approach in Iran’s urban planning. Therefore coincident new master plan in Iran (case study: Comprehensive plan of Mashhad) with specifications of strategic and structure plan approach have done based on the supposed necessity of using Strategic Structure plan in Iran. To determine the adaptation Mashhad’s Master Plan with specifications of structural strategic plan, the features from the current literature of urban planning in Iran are extracted as the first step, 10 traits are detected, which are then divided into numerous sub criteria (211 sub criteria are distinguished). Since the sub criteria are of different importance and value, the AHP method is used to determine their significances. The adaptation of Mashhad’s master plan with the sub criteria is conducted with two different methods. In the first way, searching about identified indicators in the Mashhad comprehensive plan reports is done with content analysis method. And the second way is doing questionnaire and interview with those who had involved in the process of preparation and enactment of Mashhad master plan .In other words, supervision and control is carried out through questionnaire, asking about the adaptation of Master Plan in the main criteria, results confirm the achievements. The result indicated that the comprehensive plan in Iran is not in line with the specifications of the structure plan with strategic approach. There are a significant difference between the practical structural strategic plan and the theoretical literatures. Although 3 of 10 founded traits have had similarity, but non-compliance of 7 specifications is a significant subject. The importance of this issue will be clearer when we remember that the structural strategic plan have been proposed as an appropriate model instead of traditional urban planning in Iran. This paper attempts to investigate problems in using structural strategic approach in Iran. Attention to local and native conditions is suggested, in addition to identifying the limitations in using this approach in Iran. We should remember that what was happened in the world as structural and strategic models, are the result of fundamental changes in urban planning process in those countries. This verify necessary to provide new basis for the realization of structural strategic approach in Iran. This article results state that any reformative action in the urban planning approach require fundamental reforms in the procedural and substantive aspects of urban planning basis. Iranʹs planning model should be developed in according to valuable experiences of past five decades. And so this pattern should be review and modification constantly. With this thinking, recent developments in applying structural strategic approach can be accepted as positive step in Iran urban planning approach.