بدا بين ردّ و اثبات

The Conversion of Godʹʹs will (Bada`), Acceptance or Repudiation

در «بدا » دو نظر وجود دارد.اماميه «بدا » را از اركاناصيل عقايد اسلامي مي دانند كه چهار دليل بر اين مدعي مي توان اقامه كرد كه مهم ترين آن ها آيه محو و اثبات است.علماي اهل سنت شديداً با اين عقيده مخالفند و بر آنند كه «بدا »موجب علم بعد از جهل مي شود و اين در مورد خداوند روا نيست.معناي لغوي «بدا » همان ظهور بعد از خفاست، كه البته اماميه چنين معنايي را قصد نمي كنند؛معنايي كه آنان از «بدا » اراده مي كنند،«تغيير مسير آدميان به وسيله اعمال آنان است»كه اين مطلب مورد قبول همگان است.لذا آن چه كه انكار شده است مورد اعتقاد نيست و آن چه كه مورد اعتقاد است نفي نشده است. بدين جهت اين نزاع بيش تر يك نزاع لفظي است تا يك نزاع معنوي.

Among Islamic sects There are two groups that disagree about the issue of Bada`: Imamiyeh or Shiites, from one hand considers Bada` as one of the original principles of Islamic beliefs and In order to prove this believe they have proposed four reasons, among which the most important is the deletion and notation verse (Mahv va Esbat) in Quran. On the other hand, Sunniʹs scholars are strongly against the issue of Bada` and believe that one of its implications and consequences is acceptance of Godʹs knowledge after his ignorance, while this is not admissible about God. The lexical meaning of Bada` is emersion after hiding; but Imamiyeh does not intend such a meaning. The meaning that they educe from the word Bada`, is “the change in people`s life path via their actions” and all scholars (Shiites and Sunnie) accept this fact. Therefore this conflict is indeed a lexical dispute, rather than a semantic. because, the fact which here is denieded, is not actually believed in, and what is believed in, has not been denied.