صلاحيت شوراي‌عالي اداري در تاسيس، ادغام و انحلال دستگاه‌هاي اجرايي

The Supreme Administrative Council’s competence on instituting, mergering and break-up of executive institutions

شوراي‌عالي اداري بر اساس قوانين برنامه اول، دوم، سوم و چهارم توسعه و ماده (115) قانون مديريت خدمات كشوري، از سوي مقنن داراي صلاحيت‌هايي شد كه از جمله آن‌ها اصلاح ساختار تشكيلات دستگاه‌هاي اجرايي از طريق ادغام و انحلال بود. در اين راستا، شوراي مذكور مصوباتي داشته است كه برخلاف اصول و موازين حقوقي، احكام مقنن، نظرهاي شوراي نگهبان و هيات عمومي ديوان عدالت اداري وضع و تصويب شده‌اند. عدم توجه و دقت مجلس در وضع احكام گوناگون و ظاهراً متعارض و برداشت و تفسير موسع از اين احكام سبب شد كه قوانين مصوب مجلس دست‌خوش اصلاح شوند كه به‌منظور رفع اين ايراد درسال 1386 مقنن به‌صراحت ادغام و انحلال دستگاه‌هاي اجرايي را جز صلاحيت تقنيني خود برشمرد و مرز تفكيك بين صلاحيت‌هاي قواي مقننه و مجريه را تعيين كرد. با اين حال شوراي مذكور مجدداً در مصوبات خود به تاسيس، ادغام و انحلال دستگاه‌هاي مذكور ادامه داد تا اين‌كه مقنن در قانون اصلاح ماده (53) قانون برنامه پنجم توسعه مصوب 1391 به صلاحيت تقنيني مجلس دراين خصوص تصريح نمود.

In accordance with the laws regulating the Islamic Republic of Iranʹs 1st-4th Development Programs along with 115th article under civil service management Act, the Legislator had partially authorized the Supreme Administrative Council to undertake certain decisions on its behalf. These included amendments to the formation of civil service organizations, encompassing mergers and dissolutions. However, the Council chose to enact laws which were in direct contradiction to the rules and regulations of the Guardian Council and the General Board of the Administrative Justice Court. This situation was made possible, partly due to ambiguous formulations of certain enacted laws, paving way for conflicting and wide ranging interpretations. Hence, the Legislator deemed it necessary to introduce amendments to these laws and in 2007, it undertook correcting actions, thereby reclaiming the authority to decide on merging and dissolving executive offices. In this manner, the division of power between the legislator and the executive bodies of the government were clearly delineated. Nevertheless, the Supreme Administrative Council continued to disregard these amendments, making decisions on mergers and dissolutions. Consequently, the Legislator amended article 53 to clearly state that strictly Parliament itself has the authority to decide on mergers, dissolutions, separations and formations of civil service organizations. It also clears the Supreme Administrative Council of any authority to make amendments outside and beyond this article.