حدود صلاحيت ديوان عدالت اداري در انتصاب مديران موسسات عمومي غير‌دولتي (مطالعه موردي مديرعامل سازمان تامين اجتماعي)

The Purview of the Administrative Justice Tribunal in Appointment of Directors of Non-Governmental Organizations (Case Study on the Director of Social Security Organization)

سازمان تامين اجتماعي بر اساس قانون فهرست نهادها و موسسات عمومي غير دولتي، از جمله نهادهاي عمومي غير دولتي است. اين سازمان در حال حاضر حدود 37 ميليون كارگر شاغل و بازنشسته و خانواده هاي آنان را تحت پوشش قرار داده است. همواره بين اهداف اصلي تامين اجتماعي و اهداف كلان نظام اقتصادي كشور هم‌سويي وجود دارد و همه‌ي عواملي كه فعاليت‌هاي اقتصادي و صنعتي را تحت تاثير قرار مي دهند، به نحوي بر منابع و مصارف صندوق تامين اجتماعي نيز اثرگذارند. مباحث مربوط به تامين اجتماعي از جمله قوانين و مقررات و آراي مربوط به آن از حساسيت بالايي برخوردار است. از جمله اين مباحث مي توان به دو راي اخير هيات عمومي ديوان عدالت اداري راجع‌به انتصاب مديرعامل سازمان تامين اجتماعي اشاره كرد. در اين مقاله سعي شده است صرفاً با تاكيد بر مباحث حقوق عمومي، رويكرد ديوان عدالت اداري به اين موضوع از دو جهت شكلي و ماهوي به بحث گذارده شود.

The Social Security Organization, according to The List of Non-governmental Organizations and Public Institutions Act, is a non-governmental public organization. It currently supports about 33 million workers, retirees and their families. Always there is alignment among the main objectives of social security and economic objectives of the country. All the factors that effect on economic and industrial activities have an impact on resources and costs of the social security organization. All of this has led to importance of the social security issues, including relative laws, regulations and decisions, and attract the attention of many people. Among these decisions can be pointed to two recent decisions that have been issued by the Board of Administrative Justice Court regarding to appointment of the Director of the Social Security Organization. These decisions showed the importance of the public law’s issues in the community. Although usually taken journalistic analysis in conjunction with the decisions and it has been politically, but it is necessary to criticize these decisions by the perspective of public law. In this paper we have attempted to discuss these decisions simply legal perspective, with emphasis on issues of public law from both formal and substantial aspects.