عنوان مقاله :
Comparison of hemodynamic stability, bleeding, and vomiting in propofol-remifentanil and isoflurane-remifentanil techniques in septorhinoplasty surgery
پديد آورندگان :
Kazemi Haki، Behzad نويسنده B.S of Anesthesia of Dr. Tizro Surgical Center, - Tabriz University of Medical Science- Student Research Committee. Tabriz , Iran. , , Eftekhari، Javad نويسنده Anesthesiology Expert of Dr. Tizro Surgical center. Urmia , Iran. , , Alizadeh، Vahid نويسنده Anesthesiology Expert of Dr. Tizro Surgical Center Urmia , Iran. , , Tizro، Parasto نويسنده G.P of Dr. Tizro Surgical Center Urmia , Iran. ,
كليدواژه :
Hemodynamic stability, Bleeding, Recovery time, propofol, Isoflurane, Septorhinoplasty
چكيده فارسي :
Background: Due to prevalence of septorhinoplasty surgery in
Iran and in the world, and the importance of anesthetic
technique in bleeding and conducting an accurate and
uncomplicated surgery, we decided to compare the
hemodynamic stability, bleeding and recovery time with the
two techniques in the surgical anesthetic propofol and
isoflurane in septorhinoplasty.
Material and methods: This is a prospective, double-blind,
and randomized trial study in which enrolled 60 patients
undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery in class ASA I and ASA
II. The patients were divided into two groups of 30 anesthetized
with propofol and isoflurane. Then hemodynamics changes,
bleeding and surgeon satisfaction were evaluated and recorded
for both groups during surgery and after (recovery). Data were
analyzed using SPSS V18.
Results: Of 60 patients, 40 were females and 20 males, with a
mean age of 25 ± 2.3 years old. The patients had no underlying
disease, and their anesthesia and surgical characteristics were
similar. Bleeding mean was 155 ± 14.3 ml in the propofol
group, and 164.12 ± 18.24 ml in the isoflurane group, which
was not significantly different in terms of bleeding . There was
a significant difference between recovery time and incidence of
nausea and vomiting between the two groups
(P < 0.05), therefore the average recovery time was 20.23 ±
3.28 in the propofol group min and 25.13 ± 4.72 min in the
isoflurane group. Intraoperative hemodynamics was not
significantly different between the two study groups (P > 0.05).
The average duration of surgery in both groups was 179 ± 21
min.
Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that there were
no significant differences between bleeding and hemodynamic
stability in the two methods, and anesthesia and induction in
both techniques can be used in septorhinoplasty surgery.
However, since the recovery time was short and incidence of
nausea and vomiting in anesthesia with propofol was less than
isoflurane, it seemed that the use of propofol was better than
isoflurane.
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان