تبييني جديد از تقسيم معقولات مبتني بر حكمت متعاليه

A New Explanation of the Division of Intelligibles based on the Transcendent Philosophy

بررسي جايگاه مفاهيم و نحوه تعامل ذهن و عين از مباحث مهم در عرصه معرفت‌شناختي و هستي‌شناختي تلقي ميگردد. مبحث معقولات ـ ‌اولي و ثانوي‌ ـ ‌و تمايز ميان آنها نيز در همين راستا قرار دارد. ديدگاه رايج درباره تمايز و فرق معقول اول و ثاني به اين صورت است كه معقولات اولي ـ بخلاف معقولات ثاني منطقي و فلسفي ـ مصداق خارجي دارند. مقاله حاضر معيار مصداقداري در خارج را براي تفرقه بين معقولات اولي و ثانيه ناكافي دانسته و در عوض، نقش نظريه اصالت وجود را مهم و تاثير‌گذار ارزيابي مينمايد.

The place of concepts and the quality of the interaction between the mind and the object are two of the important issues in the fields of epistemology and ontology. The problems of primary and secondary intelligibles and their distinction from each other also enjoy equal significance. The common view regarding the difference between primary and secondary intelligibles is that, unlike the logical and philosophical secondary intelligibles, primary intelligibles have some external referents. In this paper, the writer maintains that this criterion is not enough for distinguishing them from each other. To justify his position, he argues that the theory of the principiality of existence plays an influential role in clarifying the distinction between these two types of intelligibles.