گفتمان نوسازي و واگرايي سياست هاي توسعه و بهره برداري هاي كشاورزي

Discourse of modernization and divergence of policy development and operation of Agriculture

در مديريت فضاي روستايي در ايران همواره تاكيد بر نقش محوري كشاورزي و رشد و توسعه اين بخش حاكم بوده است. از طرفي تلاش هاي توسعه اي صورت گرفته در اغلب موارد نتيجه درخوري نداشته و ترديد متوليان امور را درخصوص كمك به اين بخش افزون كرده است؛ به گونه اي كه سياست هاي عمومي توسعه روستايي در سال هاي اخير تغيير رويه دادند و به دنبال گزينه هاي جايگزيني نظير گردشگري هستند . با اين حال، در بررسي نيروي شكل دهي به سكونتگاه هاي روستايي نبايد به فضاي ترديد همراهي/تضاد با گسترش كشاورزي در جوامع محلي به تجزيه و تحليل پرداخت. پژوهش حاضر نشان مي دهد كه چگونه « گفتمان » اكتفا كرد، بلكه بايد در سطح محروميت زدايي و رفع عقب افتادگي روستا و ) « نوسازي » و به تبع آن كشاورزي در برابر گفتمان « روستابودگي » كشاورزي) و در مقابلِ گفتمان نوگراي محافل علمي و دانشگاهي (حفظ بقاياي فرهنگي و دانش بومي ) موضع سعي در تحميل قدرت و كنشگري خود به ديگري « جامعه زيستي » مقاومتي درپيش گرفته است و در جايگاه دارد. چنين وضعيتي تاكنون ثبات نسبي داشته و همواره به چالش كشيده شده است و بازسازي م يشود. به همين منظور، راهبرد حاكميت ازطريق جامعه مي تواند مبنايي براي پركردن شك اف سياست هاي عمومي توسعه و به معياري براي پيشرفت « سياست هاي روستايي » به « سياست روستايي » بهره برداري هاي محلي باشد و حركت از به سمت اين رويكرد بدل شود.

Introduction The future development of agriculture and the preoccupation of policy-makers and development specialists And many efforts by the authorities in recent decades has been to promote this sector. While development efforts on rural lands "inefficient" and "traditional" and No conclusions favorable to the governmentʹs continuing political elites and the lower support of local and regional initiatives begun. The study of the social and economic development programs can be said that political management efforts based on this approach, How community development programs in order to promote the ideas and ideals of modernization discourse. Follow this strategy in the process of development programs in the country creates problems for the agricultural sector and the rural settlements of the undesirable brought to outcomes. Instructions and force modernization and the operation should be subject to the laws in the state outside of the rural, and he had no role in its development. Dialogue on all aspects of social and economic modernization with its own sovereignty penetrated rural communities and with Spoof of peasant life and its integration with the local and national level on the subject of disciplinary entrepreneurial foundation. This is the only reference to public policy-orientated to center ruralrs are responding to problems and where should aim to balance the inner realities of rural life and farming practice is to eliminate the inner realities of agriculture and rural life is on. In this connection, the fundamental question of this study can be considered as follows: The development and application of agricultural and rural development based on criteria on what basis and properties of interest and the interests of local communities and active in balanced match lifters who strive to improve the situation of rural and agricultural? Methodology In rural settlements should not force shaping the uncertainty space / conflict with local communities to stop the spread of agriculture, but also in to analyze the “discourse”, Dominate knowledge of the relationship between state structures and decision-makers in agriculture and rural investigated development process. In recent years a growing number of studies have found an effective method of discourse analysis for this effort. Discourse as a linguistic act as a " group of claims , ideas and terminology, specific facts emerged and social history ," explained and It is about power relations , the ideological and institutional changes will be .In the shadow of productive dialogue , the social elite of knowledge and beliefs about what is right to impose public . Thus , discourse analysis determines the positions behind the disputed issues by exploring the basic assumptions , values and interests Followed by the various stakeholders .The present study shows how " Rurality" and consequently agriculture in the discourse of " modernization " (deprivation and overcome the backwardness of rural and agriculture ) and the modernist discourse in academic circles ( the residue of cultural and indigenous knowledge ) local resistance taken as a " community living " trying to impose their power and influence others. Something that has always challenged the relative stability of returns .Therefore, the government’s strategy to be the basis for bridging the gap through the development and operation of local public policies and movement of “Rural Politics " to " Politics of the Rural " is an important measure of progress towards this . Results In this research, we noted that " rurality " still remain, but the torus discourse of " modernization ". This divergence of their public policies for the development and operation of local shows; that is the focus of high center and low-interest agricultural ruralrs and the lifters who strive and the lack of implementation of the imposed policies with local characteristics and interests. rurality and what is that agriculture should be associated with the concept of " power " is explored . Therefore, the rural and agricultural sector in the context of “discourse” meaning they are the product of his era discourses. In fact, the conditions are influenced discourse and discourse and dialogue based on internal mechanisms apply. In power (government relationship with the countryside and agriculture) is the product of the has been explored discourse of modernization. Your transcendental wisdom and modernization by providing a broad and unified administration of policies, rural and agricultural sector is trying to get out of local interests and national values link. While any form of public policy formulation cannot respond to questions, so have to be a local, minor on us. Discussion and Conclusion Generally, rural and agricultural sectors and trying to impose their own power and influence others. Thus, a "community living" (ancient Iranian rural) parties that have been challenged, changed and will rebuild. The strategy of " rule by the " must fill the power gap and restore the conflict occurring in public policy development and operation of the rural. Since many of the extensive and inclusive policies failed and skeptical legislators towards the effectiveness of the assistance sparked; The movement of “rural politics " to " Politics of the Rural " can measure the effectiveness of development efforts in public policy development and progress towards compliance with specifications and local interests . In relation to agriculture, we must recognize that we cannot go back to the past and in the previous stage of development of our technology. On the other hand the future canʹt afford for this part we thought because human thinking is not a way to the future and this means that the human science should have a mental imagination coexist Are unclear and the development of a conceptual remove the ignorance and ignorance is a new entry .So, we live in a time when modern technology surrounds us and transposition is left for us. However, adherence to the rule of the rural population and development policy measures can address this problem and fields to define the appropriate technology for each location and domination over nature provide sustainable .This is beginning to revive the art of Agricultural and correct the shortcomings of modern technology.