ارزيابي تاثيرات اجتماعي- اقتصادي بازارچه مرزي سِرو بر توسعه مناطق روستايي پيرامون

Assessing the Socio-economic Impacts of the Border Market of Sero on Development of Surrounding Rural Areas

پژوهش حاضر به ارزيابي تاثيرات اجتماعي- اقتصادي بازارچه مرزي سِرو (در استان آذربايجان غربي) بر توسعه مناطق روستايي پيرامون پرداخته است. در اين مطالعه از روش توصيفي-تحليلي بهره گرفته شد. جامعه آماري پژوهش، روستاهاي پيرامون بازارچه سِرو بودند. منطقه مطالعه‌شده براساس نظر كارشناسان به سه لايه با فاصله‌هاي سه، شش و نُه كيلومتري از بازارچه دسته‌بندي شدند. درمجموع 14 روستا در اين سه لايه شناسايي و مطالعه شدند. در هر روستا به‌روش نمونه‌گيري تصادفي ساده، سرپرست خانوار مورد بررسي و مطالعه قرار گرفت. جمع‌‌آوري داده‌‌ها با استفاده از پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته انجام شد. براي تعيين اعتبار ابزار پژوهش از اظهار نظر استادان و متخصصان ذي‌ربط و براي تعيين پايايي آن از هم‌‌ساني دروني به‌روش آلفاي كرونباخ استفاده شد. ضريب آلفاي كرونباخ 66/0 تا 84/0 براي متغيرهاي گوناگون به‌دست آمد كه نشان از بهينگي پرسشنامه داشت. براي تجزيه و تحليل داده‌‌ها از نرم‌‌افزار SPSS19 بهره گرفته شد. يافته‌‌هاي تحليل‌‌ واريانس نشان دادند كه بين روستاها (سه لايه مورد مطالعه) از نظر وضعيت شاخص‌‌هاي اقتصادي‌ـ اجتماعي، تفاوت معناداري وجود دارد. تاثير بازارچه سِرو بر شاخص‌‌هاي رفاه اجتماعي، اقتصاد روستايي، صنايع‌‌دستي و مشاركت ‌‌اجتماعي در روستاهاي لايه اول (سه‌كيلومتري) مشهود و به‌صورت كاهشي بود. از طرفي در لايه‌‌هاي دوم و سوم ازنظر شاخص‌‌هاي مذكور تفاوتي مشاهده نشد، بنابراين بازارچه موجب كاهش وضعيت اين شاخص‌‌ها شده است و اثر كاهشي بر كيفيت زندگي تا لايه دوم قابل ره‌گيري است. تحليل اثر كل نشان مي‌دهد كه محدوده تاثير اين بازارچه تا شعاع شش‌كيلومتري بوده و اثر اقتصادي آن در منطقه روستايي پيرامون بيش از اجتماعي و كاهشي بوده است.

Development projects and trade plans in Iran and many developing countries have been criticized for their detrimental effects on various aspects, and sustainability at large. Accordingly, there is a widespread consensus about the importance of impact assessment of these plans on rural areas. Then, in line with the triple bottom line approach from sustainable development, the impact assessment is of particular important in considering the sustainability of development project and plans. In this regard, establishing Border Markets are one of these plans that the government implemented to develop regions specially border areas in Iran. The basic goals ratified by these border markets are: to raise the socioeconomic standard of living of local people, to create permanent legal jobs, to reduce smuggling, and finally to provide legal sources of revenue for them. It is while that seems the common border markets of Iran which have been established to improve the welfare and income of local people have not been so much successful in attainment of their goals, and unemployment, smuggling, and illegal trades in border towns are still tough problems for people and government authorities. The Sero Border Market is a plan to develop border region especially rural areas of Somae-Barasou County. Somae-Brasou is located in the west of West Azerbaijan Province, at a distance of 45 KMs from Urmia, the capital town of the province. It neighbors Turkey. The Sero Border Market as a great development plan in the West Azarbaijan province was started in 1991 in high potential region. Establishing the market potentially caused many social, economic and environmental changes in surrounding rural areas. Therefore, the objects of this study were: • To screen the impacts of Sero Border Market on development of surrounding rural areas; • To scope the impacts of Sero Border Market on development of surrounding rural areas; and • To model rang and levels of Sero Border Market’s impacts. The study will make certain suggestions to raise local people’s income resources, to increase exports and therefore to raise foreign exchange revenues, to develop business knowledge of local people, and finally make some practical and useful suggestions to correct and improve the performance of common border markets. The study was discovery quantitative research methodology. The research method also was descriptive-analytical in the form of comparative approach. The comparative design is an accepted research technique for exploring the impacts that cannot be manipulated experimentally. Statistic population of the study was the rural people who lived in the villages that surrounding by the market. For this purpose, the villages were categorized in three group distance of three, six, and nine kilometers from the market with the aid of Arc-GIS software. Fifteen villages are investigated in the study. Six villages from the first, six from the second, and three from the third layer were selected and investigated. The sample size of the rural people was determined by using the sampling size table given by Patten. The final sample included 204 heads of households from villages with the market were selected. Accordingly, 40 % of rural people in each village participated in this study. Face-to-face interviews were used to collect data with the aid of questionnaire containing open and closed questions. For this purpose, a complete list of the items regarding impacts was developed. The impact items were categorized in 10 impact criteria by a panel of experts. They include: demographic characteristics, structure, perceived wellbeing, social capital, social participation, social structure development, quality of life, agriculture, and economic conditions, conservation of community resources, and living pattern and model. Due to determining the reliability of the questionnaire, internal contingency by Cronbach’s Alpha value was implemented that the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient (0.66 to 0.84) were confirmed the questionnaire. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical package (version 19 for widows), which consisted of reliability measures, ANOVA test, and path analysis. A significance level of 0.05 was used to establish statistical significance. Findings showed that the market has declined some criteria such as social welfare, rural economic, development of handicraft, social participation, and quality of life. Meanwhile, the great declining was in the rural peopleʹs economic criteria. In the other hands, social welfare, rural economic, development of handicraft, social participation, and quality of life were declined by the Sero Border Market. Also, the market has had an impact only on the villages at a distance of six kilometers. Furthermore, results of a path analysis suggested that the age, income and attitude toward the market were the most factors explaining evaluation towards impacts of border market of Sero.