مرکز منطقه ای اطلاع رساني علوم و فناوري - الگوي استقرار نظام جانش ني پروري در مد يري ت دانشگاه

چكيده لاتين :

هدف نيا مطالعه، بررس ي واجد اعتبار بودن الگوي طراح ي شده برا ي نظام جانش ني پرور ي در مـد يري ت دانشگاه از ديدگاه يمد ران اجرايي و علمي دانشگاهها يم باشد. نيا پژوهش بر مبنـا ي يرو كـرد ترك بـ ي ي اكتشاف با ي مشاركت 298 نفر از يمد ران علم و ي اجرايي انجام شد. نيا مطالعه در ادامـه مطالعـه فـ يك ي انجام شده كه هدف مرحله يفيك كاوش ها مقوله ي مرتبط با استقرار نظام جانشـ ني پـرور ي مـد يري ت در دانشگاه و فراهم نمودن مبنايي براي طراح ي پرسشنامه و مدل مفهومي برا ي استفاده در مرحله كم ي بود. در مرحله كم ي با استفاده از تجز هي و تحل لي مدل معادلات ساختاري مدلي 12 عـامل ي فـراهم شـد كـه روابط نيب عوامل استقرار نظام جانش ني پرور ي در يريمد ت دانشگاه را نشان يم دهد. ي ها افته ي پـژوهش، مدلي اكتشافي براي توصيف روابط نيب يپ شايندها، يشا ستهگرايي به عنـوان مقولـه كـانون ي، راهبردهـا ي استقرار نظام ، ابعاد و يا نهيزم مح طي ي برا ي استقرار نظام جانش ني پرور ي در يريمد ت دانشـگاه و نتـا جي حاصل از آن ارايه يم دهد The Purpose of this study was to explore, describe and explain the process of Succession System for Administration of University and develop an exploratory model of it. For this purpose, the exploratory mixed model was used and data were collected from academic and executive managers in Tehran Public Universities during two-stage. In the first stage, based on the grounded theory method, 12 interviews were conducted with experts, former and current managers in fields of academic and executive, expert teachers, and policy makers. After three stages of data analysis, the main and subcategories of Succession System process and relationship between them were obtained.Based on results of qualitative research phase, a questionnaire and initial model was designed. Finally, with the Participation of 289 academic and executive managers in Tehran Public Universities, questionnaires were performed and analyzed. Data was analyzed for finding the relationship between endogenous and exogenous variables and generalizing of qualitative results. Indices of model indicated the good fit of data to conceptual model that was assumed based on research findings in the first stage of research. The results showed the 12 categories in the paradigmatic model including: Causal conditions (Discourse-Making, Scientific Vision, Maturity, Accountability System), main category (Meritocracy), Succession strategies (Talent Management, Empowerment), context (Stakeholders Participation, Culture and Atmosphere Supportive, Permanency); Intervening conditions (Academic Independence) and outcome (organizational development), were reflected the process of Succession System in university and the relationships between different aspects of it. In the final phase of quantitative research, hypotheses extracted from the qualitative results were confirmed.