بررسي ويژگي‌هاي روان‌سنجي نسخه 6 سؤالي مقياس عملكرد جنسي زنان (FSFI-6) در زنان ايراني

THE STUDY OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE 6-ITEM VERSION OF THE FEMALE SEXUAL FUNCTION INDEX (FSFI-6) AMONGEST IRANIAN WOMEN

پيش زمينه و هدف: اغلب، متخصصان به دليل محدوديت زماني و فقدان ابزار غربالگري كوتاه، سريع و مناسب از بررسي نشانه هاي جنسي در زنان خودداري مي كنند. مبتني بر اين نياز، هدف پژوهش حاضر تعيين ويژگي هاي روان سنجي نسخه 6 سؤالي مقياس عملكرد جنسي زنان (FSFI-6) در نمونه اي از زنان ايراني بوده است. مواد و روش ها: مطالعه توصيفي مقطعي حاضر، بر روي 650 زن متأهل ساكن شهر تهران و 107 زن مبتلا به اختلالات جنسي كه به شيوه نمونه گيري در دسترس انتخاب شده بودند، صورت گرفت. روايي سازه FSFI-6 با استفاده از تحليل عامل اكتشافي و روايي همگرا و واگرا ابزار با محاسبه همبستگي بين نمره هاي آزمودني ها در FSFI-6 و نمره هاي آن ها در مقياس هاي پريشاني جنسي زنان، افسردگي اضطراب استرس، عواطف مثبت و منفي و سازگاري زناشويي لوكوالاس موردبررسي قرار گرفت. روايي ملاك FSFI-6 از طريق مقايسه نمره هاي نمونه غير باليني با نمره هاي 107 زن داراي اختلال جنسي انجام شد. همچنين پايايي FSFI-6 با محاسبه آلفاي كرونباخ و نيز ضرايب بازآزمايي (با فاصله 4 هفته) وارسي شد. يافته ها: نتايج تحليل عاملي و همبستگي هاي پيرسون از روايي سازه، روايي همگرا و واگراي FSFI-6 حمايت كرد. همچنين، نتايج نشان داد كه FSFI-6 مي تواند افراد دو گروه باليني و غير باليني را به طور موفقيت آميزي از يكديگر تفكيك كند. محاسبه آلفاي كرونباخ و ضرايب بازآزمايي حاكي از پايايي مطلوب آن بود. بحث و نتيجه گيري: يافته هاي اين مطالعه نشان مي دهد كه نسخه فارسي FSFI-6 از روايي و پايايي مناسبي برخوردار است و مي تواند به عنوان ابزاري سريع و دقيق در موقعيت هاي غربالگري، باليني و پژوهشي در زنان ايراني مورداستفاده قرار گيرد.

The Study of the Psychometric Properties of the 6Item Version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI6) amongest Iranian Women GHassami M[1]*, SHaeiri MR[2], Asgari Mogadam MA[3], Rahmati N[4] Received: 5 Jul , 2014 Accepted: 10 Sep , 2014 Abstract Background Aims : Often, practitioners avoid investigating sexual symptoms due to concerns of insufficient time or lack of proper and rapid tools to address female sexual dysfunction. The present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the 6Item Version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI6) amongst a sle of healthy Iranian women. Materials Methods: In this descriptivecorrelational study, 650 married women inhabitants of Tehran and 107 women with sexual dysfunctions were selected via a convenient sling. These participants completed the Persian versions of FSFI6, Female Sexual Distress Scale Revised (FSDSR), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), Positive and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS) and Locke WallaceMarital Adjustment Test (LWMAT).The construct validity and the convergent and divergent validity of the FSFI6 were examined by using exploratory factor analysis and Pearson correlations, respectively. To examine the discriminant validity of the FSFI6, data collected from 650 healthy participants, and they were compared with 107 women having sexual problems. Results: The results of the exploratory factor analyses indicated that the FSFI6 is conceptualized within a one factor model. Results also indicated that the FSDSR has good internal consistency and testretest reliability. Significant correlations were seen in the predicted directions between the FSFI6 scores with the scores of FSDSR, DASS, PANAS and LWMAT which support both the convergent and divergent validity for the FSFI6. The results also indicated that the scores of the FSFI6 significantly differentiated woman with and without sexual problems. Conclusions: In general, these findings support the reliability and validity of the Persian version of FSFI6, so it can be used as a rapid and accurate tool in screening, research and clinical situations among Iranian women. Key words: sexual dysfunction, Factor Analysis, reliability and validity Address: Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran Tel: (+98) 3482219348,Fax:(+98)3482219348 Email: ghasami.62@gmail.com [1] PhD Student , Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran (Corresponding Author) [2] Associate professor, Department of Psychology,Faculty of Human Sciences,Shahed University, Tehran, Iran [3] professor, Department of Psychology,Faculty of Human Sciences,Shahed University, Tehran, Iran [4] MSc, Department of Psychology,Faculty of Human Sciences,Shahed University, Tehran, Iran