شماره ركورد :
894763
عنوان مقاله :
تقدّم كلام شيعه بر معتزله
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
The Primacy of Shiite Theology over that of the Mutazilites
پديد آورندگان :
كاركن بيرق، حبيب نويسنده دانشگاه تربيت مدرس,تهران,ايران Karkon Beiragh, Habib , كرماني، طوبي نويسنده دانشكده الهيات,گروه فلسفه,دانشگاه تهران,تهران,ايران Kermani, Tuba
اطلاعات موجودي :
دوفصلنامه سال 1394 شماره 13
رتبه نشريه :
علمي پژوهشي
تعداد صفحه :
16
از صفحه :
15
تا صفحه :
30
كليدواژه :
Principles , IMAM ALI , , شيعه , معتزله , كلام , اصول , اميرالمؤمنين(ع) , The Shiites , Theology , the Mutailites
چكيده فارسي :
شيعه در طول تاريخ حيات خود، به اخذ اصول خويش از معتزله، متّهم شده است. در اين مقاله، كه به روش توصيفي تحليلي، تطبيقي و استنباطي نوشته شده است، با بيان ادلّه متعدّدي به ردّ اتّهام مذكور پرداخته شده است. دليل شيعه دانستن معتزله و بالعكس، با عنايتِ موردي به ابن ابي الحديد معتزلي، موضوع ديگر اين نوشتار است. يافته هاي اين پژوهش نشان مي دهد كه چهار عامل مشابهت شيعه و معتزله در برخي اصول، تلمّذ زيد بن علي نزد واصل بن عطا، اين كه معتزله خود را شيعه دانسته اند، و تقيّه شيعه موجب شده است تا برخي شيعه را همان معتزله بدانند. پس از اثبات مغايرت كلام شيعه و معتزله، با استناد به اقوال اميرالمؤمنين(ع) در مسائلي هم چون عدل، اختيار، عدم رؤيت خداوند، نفي تشبيه و مستقلّات عقليه كه ميان شيعه و معتزله مشترك است تقدّم كلام شيعه بر معتزله به اثبات رسيده است؛ زيرارئيس معتزله، واصل بن عطا سال ها پس از شهادت ايشان متولد شده است.
چكيده لاتين :
Shiites historically tumultuous life has always been exposed to numerous charges. One of these charges is the claim that the Shiites have received their creed from the Mutazilites. Despite the antiquity of the charge and the fact that Shia scholars have tried to answer it, the charge is still in force. The present study seeks to review the historical roots of such allegations and tries to investigate their causes by referring to some old and modern sources. It also attempts to reply the charges by indicating the distinctions between the Shiite and Mutazilite theological systems and as a result the primacy of Shiite theology over the Mutazilite will be proved. To reject the claim saying the Shiites have obtained their creeds from the Mutazilites, we have mentioned numerous proofs, the titles of which are as follow: A) The refutations offered by the Shiites against the Mutazilites B) The rebukes of the Mutazilites by Shiite Imams and scholars C) The debates of Shiite Imams and scholars with the Mutazilites D) The conversion of some Mutazilites to the Shiism E) Shiism has been charged with quot Rafḍquot by the Mutzilites. F) The difference between Shiite and Mutazilite political position. G) The Shiite belief in infallible Imam, despite the Mutzilites. H) The fundamental differences of Shiite and Mutazilite beliefs. In this research, to answer the question: quot why the Shiites are called Mutazilite by some?quot four different reasons have been offered which are as follow: A) Shiite and Mutazilite common views in some principles such as the idea of freewill, and rational good and evil. B) Studentship of Zaid bin Ali with Vasil bin Ata C) The Mutazilites calling themselves as the Shiite D) The practice of Taqiyyeh by some Shiite scholars Based on what was mentioned above, the differentiation of Shiite and Mutazilite theologies are proved. To prove the primacy of Shiite theology over that of Mutazilite, it is sufficient to refer to some of the remarks of Imam Ali (A). This is because at the time of Imam Alis martyrdom, Vasil bin Ata had not been born yet. By referring to Imam Alis remarks on justice, mans freewill, impossibility of seeing God in this world and the Hereafter, negation of similarity, and independent intellectual verdicts, which are regarded as similar beliefs in Shiite and Mutazilite theology, it is proved that the Shiites have obtained their theological teachings from their Imams and not from the Mutazilites or anyone else
سال انتشار :
1394
عنوان نشريه :
الهيات تطبيقي
عنوان نشريه :
الهيات تطبيقي
اطلاعات موجودي :
دوفصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 13 سال 1394
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان
لينک به اين مدرک :
بازگشت