پديد آورندگان :
مرداي، يعقوب نويسنده دانشگاه پيام‌نور,تهران,ايران Moradi, Yaghoub , نظري، نرگس نويسنده دانشگاه پيام نور,تهران,ايران Nazari, Narges , بسحاق، محمدرضا نويسنده دانشگاه اصفهان,ايران Bosshaq, Mohammad Reza , رحيمي، حمزه نويسنده دانشگاه اصفهان,ايران Rahimi, Hamzeh
كليدواژه :
منطقۀ 6 تهران , MCDM, AHP, GIS , MCDM , AHP , جايگاه‌هاي پمپ بنزين , gis , , مكان‌يابي
چكيده لاتين :
Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
High traffic volume is one of the most common problems of urban transportation in metropolises. The increase in the number of vehicles in case of not having necessary predictions also enhances the demand for fueling in places where mostly are unable to respond to such needs. Site selection of public facilities is an instance of policies of local governments with understanding profits due to savings in the use of resources, increasing efficiency and synergy of services, and enhancing the sense of collectivism. Such profits are highly vital particularly for those governments which are experiencing rapid population growth. Appropriate development and balanced uniform distribution of fueling stations will result in valuable achievements. The reduction in the duration and the length of fueling travels, fueling near the residential place and increasing citizens’ welfare, appropriately accessing fueling stations, the absence of gridlocks and lines in stations, increasing safety and reducing economic costs of supplying lands are among these achievements. Diverse factors such as population, economic and geographical aspects, and governmental policies, etc. should be considered in selecting optimal places for fueling stations. One of these systems is GIS. Accordingly, regarding the significance of the issue of site selection in cities such as site selection of fueling stations, the aim of the present study is optimal site selection for gas stations in Tehran 's 6th Municipality District.
2. Theoretical Framework
The multicriteria decision making method refers to concepts, approaches, models, and methods contributing to evaluation base on weights, values, or the degree of superiority from the decision maker’s viewpoint, and finally results in better decision making. Since the 1960’s, the integration of the multicriteria decision making method with GIS was considered by urban planners for solving problems of spatial planning and consequently, the multicriteria approach and GIS became bases for solving problems of planning which were involved in multiple conflicting aims such as issues of allocating land uses. This approach is so simple and flexible that a lot of criteria and indicators can be applied in it. However, decision makers may face problems in allocating weights to each of these criteria based on paired comparison. The integration of the multicriteria decision making in the form of GIS for optimally zoning urban services can have many more applications. AHP is among multicriteria decision making methods mixing qualitative and quantitative analyses, and was presented by T. L, Satti, a US expert at operational research in the 1970’s.
3. Methodology
The present study is applieddevelopmental. The research method was descriptiveanalytical. In the descriptive part of the study, library research and documentary analysis were employed. In the analytical part of the study, by investigating factors affecting site selection of gas stations, and using the land map of Tehran 's 6th District, numerical layers were created and analyzed by GIS. Then, applying the integrated method of GIS and MCDM and using AHP, as well as creating considered changes in information layers, the desired results of optimal site selection of gas stations and evaluation of current stations were achieved. The multicriteria decisionmaking method is one of the concepts, approaches, models, and methods contributing to decision makers’ evaluations based on weights, values, and the degree of superiority. Finally, it results in better decision making. The main objective of multicriteria decision making methods is to investigate a number of alternatives regarding the diverse criteria and conflicting aims.
4. Results
The results of calculated weights indicated that the access to the communication network with the highest weight as 0.482 and also the population density with the weight as 0.268 have very high significance and roles in site selection of fueling stations, while other indicators investigated in the present study have less significance. The results of the study also indicated that from among compatible land uses, fire stations with the weight as 0.421, public parking lots with the weight as 0.343, and urban terminals with the weight as 0.236 have the highest significance, respectively. Moreover, from among incompatible land uses, residential land uses with the weight as 0.331 and green spaces with the weight as 0.262 have the highest significance. The results indicated that five stations were in optimal locations, three stations were in relatively appropriate locations, and only one station was located at an inappropriate place. Therefore, except for the northeast strip and the west of the District which have inappropriate conditions for constructing new stations, other parts especially the center and south of the District have provided appropriate conditions for constructing new stations.
5. Discussion
The process of selecting optimal sites starts with identifying effective factors, and then these factors are placed in a hierarchy using the decreasing AHP model from the general aim to different criteria and subcriteria at sequential levels. There are a lot of criteria for site selection of gas stations regarding global standards, but applying all of them in zoning is impossible due to different reasons. In the present study, four criteria were used for selecting optimal sites for gas stations of Tehran 6th District. These criteria are the degree of population density, access to the traffic network, natural hazards, and compatible and incompatible land uses.
6. Conclusion
The results indicated that regarding the maps of land use, the selected criteria and investigations in Tehran 's 6th District, stations 2, 108, 115, 145, and 153 are located at optimal places and stations 15, 22, and 110 at relatively optimal places. In addition, station 24 is located at an inappropriate location. Therefore, it is better that in case of setting up new locations, potential places with high capacity be identified in order that new stations play more roles in eliminating urban problems. In contemporary urban structures, easiness and access to aims are prioritized and planning should be conducted regarding the power and identification of capabilities of zoned regions and districts.
