بررسي زمينه‌هاي يكسان انگاري وحي و تجربه ديني

Analysis of Fields of Equalizing Revelation and Religious Experience

يكي از مباحثي كه در فلسفه دين و كلام جديد وجود دارد مسئله وحي و تجربه ديني است. بحث در اين است كه آيا وحي الهي و تجربه ديني كه در مغرب زمين مطرح شده يكي بوده و كاملا بر يكديگر منطبق هستند يا اين كه خير، اين ها دو مقوله جدا از هم مي باشند؟ در اين مقاله ضمن ذكر عوامل و زمينه هاي پيدايش چنين نظريه اي به بيان معاني وحي در كلام اسلامي و مسيحيت و ماهيت تجربه ديني و ارائه برخي نظريات مطرح در هر مورد، به تبيين تفاوت هاي وحي با تجربه ديني پرداخته شده است، در نهايت، اين نظريه از دو زاويه درون ديني و برون ديني به نقد كشيده شده و اثبات مي شود كه اين تئوري نه تنها ارزش معرفتي نداشته بلكه هيچ انطباقي با وحي الهي ندارد و صرفا نظريه اي است براي برون رفت از چالش موجود بين آموزه هاي كتاب مقدس و فهمي كه نسل نو و روشنفكران از آن دارند.

Some of the issues which exist in philosophy of religion and New Testament are the issue of revelation and religious experience. The issue is this that, whether divine revelation and religious experience which is posed in the west are one thing and coincide together or not, they are two separate things? In this paper, despite mentioning the reasons of existence of this kind of theory, we state the meanings of revelation in Islam and Christianity and the essence of religious experience and representing some posed theories about both of them as well as speaking of differences between revelation and religious experience. Eventually, this theory is criticized intra-religiously and inter-religiously, and it is proved that this theory not only doesn’t have any epistemological value but also doesn’t have any consistency with divine revelation, and is only a theory for evading the existent conflict between Holy Book doctrines and the deduction of new generation and intellectuals of it.