چكيده لاتين :
Extended Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Earthquake is one of the most important factors in vulnerability of rural areas in Iran, which particularly due to shallow epicenter, causes a lot of damage. In addition to the absolute and relative position of different parts of the country, rupture of spatial organization and the lack of hierarchy based on interactive relationship among settlements, are acknowledged as the most influential factors. This condition leads to disorganization of the population, activities, services and functions, and in turn, increases the vulnerability of rural settlements against natural hazards, including earthquake. In this regard, determining appropriate pattern of settlements is seen as necessary to limit the adverse effects of earthquake.
2. THEORETICAL FRAMWORK
Distribution of settlements, with respect to the form, can be often described as; random, regular, or clustered, but are rarely seen in real conditions. Each of these patterns provides different conditions in terms of how to deal with the critical situation, if relying on inner capacities of the settlement systems, and shows different reactions against earthquake risk.
1. Dispersed pattern: is when the population in an area is uniformly distributed. According to this pattern, any of the small settlement points are developed and the further expansion of some special points are prevented. Such condition could result in dispersion of the facilities and investments.
2. Clustered pattern: is when population was concentrated in one, two, or three points. According to this pattern, rural settlements are faced with the concentration of industrial activities, services and population in those central settlements.
3. Random pattern: is when population is distributed in small and large population centers with a given order. In this pattern, although medium and larger points were developed, however, the emphasis is on the development of small points. The characteristics of each spatial patterns of the settlement system to deal with the critical situation are as follows:
In the scattered pattern, settlements have access to the minimum services and infrastructures. This pattern causes the dispersion of facilities (such as specialized therapeutic activities) and investments, which in turn, increases the vulnerability of the settlement system in critical condition, in deferent ways.
In the clustered pattern, from economic point of view, providing public and infrastructural services is desirable, but the relationship between rural settlements due to accessibility problems, remains unresolved. To maintain the central settlement from risk and minimizing vulnerability, heavy economic investment will be required to retrofit constructions, facilities, and buildings.
In the random pattern, the system has the benefits of both previous patterns. Accessibility was easier and service levels were increased. In this situation, investments and resources are concentrated on the midpoints. In such circumstances, by division of labor between the central and midpoints, the volume of activities and services in central locations as well as investment needed for retrofitting the central regions, were reduced. Therefore, much of the investments goes to medium points.
3. METHODOLOGY
This study is an applied research and was performed with descriptiveanalytic method. The statistical population of the study is 74 villages of Central District of Marand County, which entirely are included in the study. In this regard, Moran 's I index was used to determine the distribution /concentration of spatial vulnerability of rural settlements and KolmogorovSmirnov test was used to analyze the differences in distribution of villages at different levels of vulnerability in the study area. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) were used for data processing, analyzing, and presentation of the results.
4. DISCUSSION
Since the rural settlements of Central District of Marand county lie in highrisk earthquake zone, investigation of the existing spatial pattern and determining the appropriate pattern of rural settlements of the area, is necessary for reducing the destructive effects of earthquake. Therefore, in this article, beside of the determining of the settlement pattern of rural points in the region, we analyzed the vulnerability of spatial patterns of rural settlements in Central District of Marand County.
5. CONCLUSION
Moran 's I index indicates that the spatial correlation in the target area at the 99% confidence level is positive, and spatial distribution pattern of the villages in the region is highly centralized or clustered. Consequently, investigating of the spatial pattern of villages in the study area shows that they have not been distributed uniformly and balanced. Then, using Reclassify Function in the ArcGIS 9.3 software, the geographical space of the study area is classified into three areaswith high, medium, and low vulnerability, and based on the Moran 's I spatial autocorrelation, spatial analysis between the villages was performed for each area. Results show that, the villages in high vulnerability area have more tendencies for centralization and clustering. To check significant difference between two types of distributions in the villages (the observed and expected values) at different levels of vulnerability, the KolmogorovSmirnov test was used. The test results showed that the statistic (value Dmax = 0.205) is larger than critical value W (1 α) at 0.95 standard confidence level. So, there are significant differences between two distributions of rural settlements in deferent levels of vulnerability with expected values. On the one hand, it is indicative of the vulnerability of the region against natural disasters, and on the other hand, clustering of villages with high vulnerability, provides an opportunity for quick and practical organization of the situation in needed times with less cost, comparing to scattered pattern.
