كليدواژه :
انقلاب اسلامي , منطق گرايي , علم گرايي , فلسفه تحليلي و قاره اي , ضد مدرن , ضد علم گرايي
چكيده فارسي :
در جامعه ايران قبل از انقلاب اسلامي مباحثي شكل گرفت كه اين مباحث به شكل دو گفتمان رقيب با محوريت عبدالكريم سروش و رضا داوري به بعد از انقلاب كشيده شد. گفتمان سروش با علايق ديني و متاثر از تجربيات و انديشه هاي اسلامي، فلسفه علم پوپر، دقت هاي منطقي و معرفت شناختي فلسفه تحليلي و ليبراليسم آگاهانه در پي سازگاري با مدرنيته بود. گفتمان داوري با علايق ديني و هويتي به تاثير از هايدگر و فلسفه قاره اي به دفاع از فلسفه و ضديت با منطق گرايي، علم گرايي و به كار بردن پيش فرض هاي ضدروشنگري غربي در مورد جامعه، سياست، دين، علم و همچنين موضع گيري مذهبي عليه عقل انسان مدرن، به تفاسير ضد مدرن مي پردازد. اين گفتمان ها بر شكل گيري جريان هاي سياسي و اجتماعيِ مذهبي و غيرمذهبي ايران تاثيرگذار بوده و هر كدام در پي پاسخگويي به مشكلات جامعه ايران بودند. مباحث اين دو از اول انقلاب با اختلافات شروع شد و به اوج خود رسيد، اما در دوران متاخر به يكديگر نزديك تر شد. از اين رو هدف نوشته حاضر در پاسخ به اين پرسش كه فلسفه قاره اي و تحليلي چه تاثيري بر نوانديشان در جمهوري اسلامي ايران گذاشت؟ اين است كه با روش تحقيق تطبيقي و با تاكيد بر چارچوب مفهومي هرمنوتيك قصدگراي اسكينر، متاثر از فلسفه قاره اي و تحليلي به بررسي انديشه هاي داوري و سروش بپردازد.
چكيده لاتين :
The two discourses with a focus on Reza Davari Ardekani and Abdolkarim Soroush, were formed in Iran’s society. Soroush’s discourse, with religious interests influenced by Islamic sources, Poper’s philosophy of science, logic and epistemological accuracies of analytical philosophy and consciously liberalism, is looking for compatibility with modernity. The second discourse on Reza Davari Ardakani thought and its intellectual ancestry, i.e., Ahmad Fardid in combination with the religious, identical, Heideggerian and Continental interests began to deal with anti-modern interpretations such as, the defense of philosophy in opposition to the oriented logic and scientism, the use of anti-Enlightenment Western assumptions about society, politics, religion, science, and the religious stance against subjectivity or the rationality of modern man as well. The discourses, each in turn, had a significant impact on forming political and social attitudes, both religious and non-religious, and sought to respond to the problems raised in Iran’s community. Discussions of both discourses (some consider them philosophical and others ideological), which have their roots in pre-Islamic Revolution, began with disputes from the beginning of Revolution and consistently the differences reached their peak. But in recent times, the discussions of the two thinkers came closer together, and partly achieved some common standpoints. The aim of present paper, therefore, is to study the thoughts of Reza Davari Ardekani and Abdolkarim Soroush, influenced by Continental and Analytic philosophy, using a Comparative research method. It is explained how Soroush, consciously, with his religious interests, sought to become compatibile with modernity; but unlike such approach, the stance of Davari Ardekani, along with his own religious interests, was against subjectivity or modern rationality.
