رفتار اطلاع يابي پرورش‌دهندگان ماهيان گرمابي منطقه سنگر شهرستان رشت

Information Seeking Behavior of Carp Farmers in Sangar’s Area of Rasht Township, Guilan Province

هدف اين تحقيق توصيفي- پيمايشي، بررسي رفتار اطلاع يابي پرورش دهندگان ماهيان گرمابي در منطقه سنگر شهرستان رشت بود. جامعه آماري شامل همه مديران واحدهاي تكثير و پرورش ماهيان گرم آبي (100=N) بود كه حجم نمونه با استفاده از جدول حداقل حجم نمونه بارتلت و همكاران مشخص شد (70=n). ابزار اصلي پژوهش پرسشنامه اي بود كه روايي صوري و محتوايي آن توسط كارشناسان مورد تاييد قرار گرفت. همچنين براي سنجش پايايي پرسشنامه، از ضريب آلفاي كرونباخ استفاده شد (دسترسي به منابع اطلاعاتي 81/0، ارزيابي اطلاعات 72/0، حفظ و نگهداري اطلاعات 79/0). يافته هاي تحليل خوشه اي بيانگرآن بود كه افراد مورد مطالعه در اين تحقيق از لحاظ ارزيابي اطلاعات از وضعيت خوبي برخوردار بوده اند. همچنين اكثريت مديران واحدهاي پرورش ماهيان گرم‌آبي از رفتار اطلاع يابي متوسطي برخوردار بودند. بين رفتار اطلاع يابي پرورش دهندگان و ميزان تحصيلات، رابطه مثبت و معني دار وجود داشت. همچنين بين رفتار اطلاع يابي و سن رابطه منفي و معني داري در سطح خطاي يك درصد وجود داشت.

The main purpose of this descriptive–survey research was to analysis information seeking behavior of Carp Farmers in Sangar’s area of Rasht County. Information seeking behavior of farmers including definition process and gathering information of usage technology, evaluation, information saving, updating and further use of this information in necessity time, evaluated and checked. All of carp farmers (N=100) were statistical population of the study. 70 persons selected for sample statistical in this research. Content and face validity of research tool was obtained by a panel of experts. To measure the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach Alpha coefficients were calculated (alpha= 0.81- 0.79) for different part of questionnaire. The data were analyzed by SPSS software in inferential and descriptive statistics. In analytical part, there is positive significant between seeking behavior to information resources and educational level. There is negative significant between assessment information and age, but there is positive significant between this variable and educational level. Also, there is negative significant between information saving behavior and age. The results of cluster analysis showed information assessment component (M=2.67) was in first ranked, information saving component was in Second ranked (M=2.49) and access to information component (M=2.15) was in third ranked. This means that respondents have better situation in information assessment.