چكيده فارسي :
ﻫﺪف اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ راﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﯿﺰان ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺒﻮد ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد و ﮐﺎرآﻓﺮﯾﻨﯽ ﮐﺎرﮐﻨﺎن ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﻋﺎﻟﯽ آﻣﻮزش و ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ و ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ رﯾﺰي ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ. روش ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ از ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﺪف ﮐﺎرﺑﺮدي و از ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﯿﻮه ﺟﻤﻊآوري اﻃﻼﻋﺎت، ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ- ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ اﺳﺖ. ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ آﻣﺎري ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﮐﻠﯿﻪ ﻣﺪرﺳﺎن و ﮐﺎرﮐﻨﺎن ﻣﺆﺳﺴﻪ ﻋﺎﻟﯽ آﻣﻮزش و ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ و ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ رﯾﺰي ﺑﻮده ﮐﻪ ﺗﻌﺪاد آﻧﻬﺎ 220 ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس ﺟﺪول ﻣﻮرﮔﺎن 136 ﻧﻔﺮ ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ و ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از روش ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﮔﯿﺮي ﺗﺼﺎدﻓﯽ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ اي (ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس دو ﮔﺮوه زﻧﺎن و ﻣﺮدان) از ﺑﯿﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ آﻣﺎري اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺮاي ﺟﻤﻊآوري دادهﻫﺎ از ﺳﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ اﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪارد اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ: ﺑﺮاي ﺟﻤﻊ آوري داده ﻫﺎ از ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎي اﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪارد. ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﭘﺎﺗﺮﺳﻮن (1992)، رﻓﺘﺎر ﮐﺎرآﻓﺮﯾﻨﺎﻧﻪ زاﻣﭙﺘﺎﺗﯿﮏ و ﻣﻮﺳﺘﺎﮐﯿﺲ (2007) و ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﻓﺮﺟﯽ (1389) اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺮاي ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ رواﯾﯽ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ، از رواﯾﯽ ﺻﻮري و ﻣﺤﺘﻮاﯾﯽ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ و ﺑﺮاي اﻃﻤﯿﻨﺎن از ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﯿﺰ، ﺑﻪ اﺟﺮاي آزﻣﺎﯾﺸﯽ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ روي ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ اي ﺑﺎ ﺣﺠﻢ 30 ﻧﻔﺮ اﻗﺪام و ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎر ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ آﻧﻬﺎ از ﻃﺮﯾﻖ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ آﻟﻔﺎي ﮐﺮوﻧﺒﺎخ ﺑﺮآورد ﮔﺮدﯾﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮري ﮐﻪ ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ 0/83، ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﮐﺎرﮐﻨﺎن0/79 و ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ رﻓﺘﺎرﻫﺎي ﮐﺎرآﻓﺮﯾﻨﺎﻧﻪ 0/86 ﺑﺪﺳﺖ آﻣﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺮاي ﺗﺠﺰﯾﻪ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ داده ﻫﺎ از ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎي آﻣﺎر ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﺮاواﻧﯽ، درﺻﺪ، ﻧﻤﻮدار، ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎي ﮔﺮاﯾﺶ ﻣﺮﮐﺰي (ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ، ﻣﯿﺎﻧﻪ، ﻣﺪ)، ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎي ﮔﺮاﯾﺶ ﭘﺮاﮐﻨﺪﮔﯽ ( اﻧﺤﺮاف اﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪارد، وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ، داﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮات، ﮐﻤﯿﻨﻪ، ﺑﯿﺸﯿﻨﻪ) و آزﻣﻮﻧ ﻬﺎي اﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﯽ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﮐﺎﻟﻤﻮﮔﺮوف- اﺳﻤﯿﺮﻧﻒ ﺑﺮاي ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻧﺤﻮه ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ داده ﻫﺎ، و آزﻣﻮﻧﻬﺎي ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﭘﯿﺮﺳﻮن و رﮔﺮﺳﯿﻮن ﺑﺮاي ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮاﻟﻬﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن داده اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺒﻮد ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻢ و ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري وﺟﻮد دارد. ﺑﯿﻦ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺑﺎ رﻓﺘﺎرﻫﺎي ﮐﺎرآﻓﺮﯾﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﮐﺎرﮐﻨﺎن ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻢ و ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري وﺟﻮد دارد و ﺑﯿﻦ ﺑﻬﺒﻮد ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﺑﺎ ﮐﺎرآﻓﺮﯾﻨﯽ ﮐﺎرﮐﻨﺎن ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻢ و ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري وﺟﻮد دارد.
چكيده لاتين :
The present study was aimed to identify the relationship between the level of attention to social capital and
improvement in performance and entrepreneurship of employees in training and research institute of
management and planning. Research method was practical in terms of objective; and in terms of data collection
method, it was correlational-descriptive. The statistical population consisted of all teachers and employees
working in the research and training institute for management and planning (220 individuals). The statistical
sample included 136 individuals who were selected using a Morgan table and a stratified random sampling
method (based on two groups: men and women). In order to collect data, three standard questionnaires were
used: Paterson's job performance questionnaire (1992), Zamptatic and Mustakis's entrepreneurial behavior
questionnaire (2007), and Faraji's social capital questionnaire (2010). In order to determine the validity of the
questionnaires, face and content validity was used. And to ensure the reliability of the questionnaires, all three
questionnaires were implemented for a sample of 30 individuals; and considering the structure of the
questionnaires, their reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The reliability of social
capital questionnaire was calculated to be 0.83; it was calculated to 0.79 for employees' performance
questionnaire; and for entrepreneurial behaviors questionnaires, it was calculated to be 0.86. In order to analyze
data, descriptive statistics indexes were used, such as frequency, percentage, graph, central orientation indexes
(average, mean, mode), dispersion orientation indexes (standard deviation, variance, magnitude of changes,
minimum, maximum), and inferential tests like Kolmogorov-Smirnov for examination of data distribution; and
Pearson Correlation and regression tests for responding to questions. Results showed that there is a direct and
significant correlation between social capital and performance improvement; that there is a direct and
significant correlation between social capital and employees' entrepreneurial behaviors; and that there is a
direct and significant correlation between performance improvement and employees' entrepreneursh