جمهوري اسلامي ايران و ناصريسم

Islamic Republic of Iran and Nasserism

ناصريست‌ها از جمله احزاب و تشكل هاي فعال و تأثيرگذار در مصر هستند كه اشتراكات زيادي در مواضع سياست خارجي خود با جمهوري اسلامي ايران دارند. با اين‌ حال، نقاط افتراقي نيز وجود دارد. مقابله آن‌ها با اسرائيل، جهان‌سوم گرايي و عدم تعهد مهمترين نقاط اشتراك است. پان‌عربيسم و سكولاريسم نيز مهمترين نقاط افتراق آن‌ها با جمهوري اسلامي ايران است. اما در شرايط كنوني، نقاط افتراق به حالت مسكوت درآمده‌اند. ناصريست‌ها از ظرفيت‌هاي بالايي براي برقراري رابطه سازنده با ايران، به ويژه در مورد حمايت از بشار اسد، برخوردار هستند. برقراري رابطه با آن‌ها با چالش‌هاي كمتري نسبت به برقراري رابطه با اسلام‌گرايان افراطي براي ايران همراه است. با اين حال، سكولار بودن آن‌ها مانع از شكل‌گيري ادبيات علمي مناسب در اينباره در ايران شده است. حال سوال آن است كه با بررسي نقاط اشتراك و افتراق ميان جمهوري اسلامي ايران و ناصريسم محورهاي همكاري دوجانبه چه خواهند بود؟ براي اين منظور در ابتدا چيستي ناصريسم و احزاب آن و چگونگي روابط ميان آنها با جمهوري اسلامي مورد مطالعه قرار مي‌گيرد. سپس، مهمترين بنيادهاي فكري اين گروه براي تطابق با بنيادهاي فكري جمهوري اسلامي بررسي خواهد شد. با بررسي نقاط افتراق و اشتراك مي توان رويكرد مناسب براي برقراري رابطه را استخراج نمود. در نهايت اين مقاله، نشان مي‌دهد كه جهان سوم‌گرايي و عدم تعهد رويكرد مناسبي است كه همگرايي بيشتر را ايجاد خواهد كرد.

Nasserists are one of the active and effective social and Political parties who have lots of similarities to Islamic Republic of Iran in foreign policy. But, there are some differences. Their combating to Israel, thid wordism and defending non alignment movement are the most important similarities. Also, Pan Arabism and secularism are the most important points of differences to IRI. However, the differences are suspended at this time. Nasserists have high potential to make constructed relation to Iran, especially to support Bashar Asad. To make relation with them has less challenges than connection to Sunni Islamist.Yet, its secularism has rejected making proper literature in Iran. The article studies Nasserism and its political branches and their relations to IRI. In addition, the most prominent of their thought are reviewed to find their similarities to IRI. At the end, the article shows that emphasis on thid wordism and defending non alignment is a proper approach for integration. We need to find other aspects of making relations and we believe that our political thought includes them. So finding and putting them to a proper manner is important. So, many kinds of relations are opened for us and we can develop our integrated party in the region. We need to find other aspects of making relations and we believe that our political thought includes them. So finding and putting them to a proper manner is important. So, many kinds of relations are opened for us and we can develop our integrated party in the region.We need to find other aspects of making relations and we believe that our political thought includes them. So finding and putting them to a proper manner is important. So, many kinds of relations are opened for us and we can develop our integrated party in the region.We need to find other aspects of making relations and we believe that our political thought includes them. So finding and putting them to a proper manner is important. So, many kinds of relations are opened for us and we can develop our integrated party in the region.