Coronary Responses and Differential Mechanisms of Late Stent Thrombosis Attributed to First-Generation Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents

Objectives rpose of this study was to assess the mechanism(s) of late stent thrombosis (LST) and vascular healing responses in first-generation polymeric drug-eluting stents (DES). ound clinical trials have reported variations in late lumen loss between first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). Little is known, however, about the vascular responses, time course of healing, and underlying mechanism(s) of complications of LST between platforms in human coronary implants. s erall analysis included 174 cases (230 DES lesions) from the CVPath Instituteʹs stent registry. Histomorphometry was performed on coronary stents from 127 patients (171 lesions) who died ≥30 days after receiving stent implants in which fibrin deposition, endothelial strut coverage, inflammatory response, and mechanism(s) of in-stent thrombosis were assessed. s latforms demonstrated increased neointimal thickness over time where values were greater in PES (mean 0.13 mm; range 0.03 to 0.20 mm) than SES (mean 0.10 mm; range 0.04 to 0.15 mm; p = 0.04). The percentage of uncovered struts was similar between SES and PES including stents with LST (SES = 21% vs. PES = 27%; p = 0.47). The underlying mechanism(s) of LST, however, was strikingly different between platforms; localized strut hypersensitivity was exclusive to SES, whereas malapposition secondary to excessive fibrin deposition was the underlying cause in PES. Moreover, although both PES and SES showed nearly complete strut coverage after 12 months for on-label use, the majority of stents placed for off-label indications remained unhealed after 12 months in both types of DES. sions ential mechanisms of LST involving either hypersensitivity or excessive fibrin were identified between first-generation DES in which overall stent healing was further delayed in DES placed for off-label indications.